I read this book all by my lonesome. It wasn't for school. It was for leisure. This was a wonderful book, and I greatly enjoyed it. One can learn great stuff forget from this book, and forget even more than you learn. A recommend this book to anyone interested in history. ( )

I keep dipping in and out of this, for reference. ( )

A useful, if necessarily brief, overview of the subject.

Impressive Accomplishment, but Fundamentally Flawed: John Roberts' "History of the World" is an impressive tome that undertakes what many thought to be an impossible task: writing a single-volume history of the world from pre-human times until the present day. The result is not a book for those who lack either time or commitment. With 922 history-packed pages, "History of the World" is a book that cannot be read in any short amount of time.

However, I did have a couple of problems with Roberts' work. For one thing, Europe clearly occupies the central role in the narrative. The entire precolonial histories of India and China receive only 15 and 17 pages in this book, respectively. The mere 400 years of Western Europe's "Dark Ages" (AD700 - 1100) on the other hand, are discussed over 25 pages. While some amount of Eurocentrism in a historical work can be forgiven due to Europe's global domination in recent centuries, discrepancies such as this one seem excessive, to say the least. Roberts' book at its worst moments seems to be a history of Europe with occasional chapters on the rest of the world tossed in at the appropriate times, as opposed to a balanced history of the world.

I was also mildly irritated by some of the illustrations and maps which appear in the "History of the World." The artwork and photographs were generally related to the text, although they didn't add much to the narrative. Some, however, were completely random. Why would someone include Byzantine art with a discussion of Japan's Meiji Restoration? The maps were usually of decent quality, though many were cramped and hard to read. Some of these also appeared to be included in the book as afterthoughts. I'll supply one example: a map detailing the spread of Muslim rule in India accompanies a discussion of the Indian Mauryan Empire, which rose and fell centuries before the founding of Islam. Some readers may not be bothered by these rather slight annoyances; others may be irritated, as I was.

Ultimately, though, the central dilemma of Roberts' "History of the World" is its very nature. Trying to write a one-volume history of the world seems an act of almost foolhardy ambition. The end result packs in so much history that it is too imposing to be of use as an introductory reading, but at the same time is not able to go 'deep' enough to please history buffs (who will likely know most of what they read). To put it simply, I don't think that super-large one-volume histories are the best way to read (or write) history. Although Roberts' work is certainly impressive, I would recommend that readers seek out more in-depth works on more specific historical topics instead of devoting themselves to this "History of the World." Three stars. ( )