Language: English [ others ]
Hide this

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science by Alan D. Sokal
Loading...

Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science

by Alan D. Sokal

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingConversations
37079,690 (3.84)2

Members

all members

Recently added by: private library, hjboer75, andreas.creutz, dveselka, rachelsmdai, akbrumley, karlowishlist

Member tags

numbers | all tags

LibraryThing recommendations

Common KnowledgeShare what you know.

view history Creative Commons License ?
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Series (with order)
Canonical Title
Original publication date
People/Characters
Important places
Important events
Awards and honors
Epigraph
Dedication
First words
Quotations
Last words
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Blurbers

LibraryThing members' description

Creative Commons License ?
Book description

Book descriptions

Amazon.com (ISBN 0312204078, Paperback)

In 1996, an article entitled "Transgressing the Boundaries: Toward a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity" was published in the cultural studies journal Social Text. Packed with recherché quotations from "postmodern" literary theorists and sociologists of science, and bristling with imposing theorems of mathematical physics, the article addressed the cultural and political implications of the theory of quantum gravity. Later, to the embarrassment of the editors, the author revealed that the essay was a hoax, interweaving absurd pronouncements from eminent intellectuals about mathematics and physics with laudatory--but fatuous--prose.

In Fashionable Nonsense, Alan Sokal, the author of the hoax, and Jean Bricmont contend that abuse of science is rampant in postmodernist circles, both in the form of inaccurate and pretentious invocation of scientific and mathematical terminology and in the more insidious form of epistemic relativism. When Sokal and Bricmont expose Jacques Lacan's ignorant misuse of topology, or Julia Kristeva's of set theory, or Luce Irigaray's of fluid mechanics, or Jean Baudrillard's of non-Euclidean geometry, they are on safe ground; it is all too clear that these virtuosi are babbling.

Their discussion of epistemic relativism--roughly, the idea that scientific and mathematical theories are mere "narrations" or social constructions--is less convincing, however, in part because epistemic relativism is not as intrinsically silly as, say, Regis Debray's maunderings about Gödel, and in part because the authors' own grasp of the philosophy of science frequently verges on the naive. Nevertheless, Sokal and Bricmont are to be commended for their spirited resistance to postmodernity's failure to appreciate science for what it is. --Glenn Branch

(retrieved from Amazon Mon, 25 Aug 2008 04:38:28 -0400)

(see all 2 descriptions)

editBuy, borrow, swap or view

Abebooks
Alibris
Amazon.com
Barnes & Noble
BookFinder.com
BookSense
Worldcat

Swap this book (0/12)

Google Books: Loading...

Popular covers

 

Help/FAQs | About | Privacy/Terms | Blog | Contact | LibraryThing.com | APIs | WikiThing | Common Knowledge | 33,438,440 books!