Picture of author.

Edward Feser

Author of Aquinas (A Beginner's Guide)

20+ Works 1,556 Members 9 Reviews 1 Favorited

About the Author

Edward Feser teaches philosophy at Pasadena City College in Pasadena, California.

Includes the names: Edward Feser, Dr Edward Feser

Image credit: Photo by Edward Feser

Works by Edward Feser

Associated Works

The Meaning of Life and the Great Philosophers (2018) — Contributor — 9 copies
Personal Identity (2005) — Contributor — 4 copies

Tagged

Common Knowledge

Members

Reviews

The central contention of the "New Atheism" of Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris, and Christopher Hitchens is that there has for several centuries been a war between science and religion, that religion has been steadily losing that war, and that at this point in human history a completely secular scientific account of the world has been worked out in such thorough and convincing detail that there is no longer any reason why a rational and educated person should find the claims of any religion the least bit worthy of attention. But as Edward Feser argues in The Last Superstition there is not, and never has been, any war between science and religion at all. There has instead been a conflict between two entirely philosophical conceptions of the natural order: on the one hand, the classical "teleological" vision of Plato, Aristotle, Augustine, and Aquinas, on which purpose or goal-directedness is as inherent a feature of the physical world as mass or electric charge; and the modern "mechanical" vision of Descartes, Hobbes, Locke, and Hume, according to which the physical world is comprised of nothing more than purposeless, meaningless particles in motion. As it happens, in the classical teleological picture, the existence of God, the immortality of the soul, and the natural-law conception of morality are rationally unavoidable. Modern atheism and secularism have thus always crucially depended for their rational credentials on the insinuation that the modern, mechanical picture of the world has somehow been established by science. Yet this modern "mechanical" picture has never been established by science, and cannot be, for it is not a scientific theory in the first place but merely a philosophical interpretation of science. Moreover, as Feser shows, the philosophical arguments in favor given by the early modern philosophers were notable only for being surprisingly weak. The true reasons for its popularity were then, and are now, primarily political: It was a tool by which the intellectual foundations of ecclesiastical authority could be undermined and the way opened toward a new secular and liberal social order oriented toward commerce and technology. To further these political ends, it was simply stipulated, by fiat as it were, that no theory inconsistent with the mechanical picture of the world would be allowed to count as "scientific." As the centuries have worn on and historical memory has dimmed, this act of dogmatic stipulation has falsely come to be remembered as a "discovery." However, not only is this modern philosophical picture rationally unfounded, it is demonstrably false. The "mechanical" conception of the natural world, when worked out consistently, absurdly entails that rationality, and indeed the human mind itself, are illusory. The so-called "scientific worldview" championed by the New Atheists thus inevitably undermines its rational foundations, and into the bargain (and contrary to the moralistic posturing of the New Atheists) it undermines the foundations of any possible morality as well. By contrast, and as The Last Superstition demonstrates, the classical teleological picture of nature can be seen to find powerful confirmation in developments from contemporary philosophy, biology, and physics; moreover, morality and reason itself cannot possibly be made sense of apart from it. The teleological vision of the ancients and medievals is thereby rationally vindicated - and with it the religious worldview they based upon it.… (more)
 
Flagged
Mandrilillo99 | 6 other reviews | Jul 24, 2022 |
An excellent and thoughtful book about the most important arguments for God's existence given the theistic and Thomistic basis of the author. Also, it contains several counter-argumentations against some of the most mainstream attempts to disprove these arguments and the discipline in general.
 
Flagged
Mandrilillo99 | Jul 23, 2022 |
not very well argued defense of Aristotle against contemporary science and atheism
 
Flagged
ritaer | 6 other reviews | Aug 24, 2021 |
Courtier's Reply, the book. Apparently, Platonic Ideals are compelling evidence that materialism is wrong, the mind is magic and immaterial, God exists as first mover and final cause.

Not sure how I got here, some apologetics link from long ago. I think Feser's trying for Dawkins snarkiness (a low bar, I know) but just comes off as bitchy in a pathetically irrelevant way.
 
Flagged
nicdevera | 6 other reviews | Oct 1, 2020 |

Awards

You May Also Like

Associated Authors

Robert Bolton Contributor
Stephen Williams Contributor
E. J. Lowe Contributor
David Charles Contributor
Lloyd P. Gerson Contributor
Gyula Klima Contributor
Stephen Boulter Contributor
Allan Silverman Contributor
David S. Oderberg Contributor
Kathrin Koslicki Contributor
Jr. Fred D. Miller Contributor
Tuomas E. Tahko Contributor

Statistics

Works
20
Also by
2
Members
1,556
Popularity
#16,557
Rating
½ 4.3
Reviews
9
ISBNs
44
Languages
4
Favorited
1

Charts & Graphs