This topic is currently marked as "dormant"—the last message is more than 90 days old. You can revive it by posting a reply.
2EadieB
Under the law it was not the right thing to do. I was not completely surprised because he knew that D-King would take matters into his own hand and Hunter realizes that something murders are let loose because of a minor loophole or a very good lawyer.
3bhabeck
legally no he shouldn't have walked away. But I think he'd pretty much reached the end at that point...until D-King gave him a "clue" then he had to go deal with the bigger danger and he could let D-King take care of the actors and their boss
4Jen_Bartels
Totally against the law and he knew it, but he had bigger fish to fry and D-King was right that those guys would not have served enough time for their crimes. I do think he did the right thing, they got theirs and no other innocent women will be subjected to them and their heinous acts.
5Carol420
He should never, legally, even allowed D-King to involve himself with this matter...but he felt that morally he was doing the right thing. I don't think D-King will forget this or take it lightly. Robert has more than likely made a "friend" in D-King and Jerome and somewhere down the line this "favor" will be repaid.
6Sergeirocks
I have no qualms about Hunter's decision, those smug prisoners had the smiles wiped of their faces, no messing. IMO they deserve everything that D-King could do to them.
7Andrew-theQM
Legally not the right thing, but it definitely worked in the context of the novel.
8bluebird_
>5 Carol420: Is this a hint of things to come?
Hunter should not have walked away, but it makes for a great story. I agree he's forged a bond with D-King and Jerome that may aid him in the future.
Hunter should not have walked away, but it makes for a great story. I agree he's forged a bond with D-King and Jerome that may aid him in the future.
9Carol420
>8 bluebird_: D-King hasn't showed up in any of the books I've read so far but Chris Carter may be keeping him in reserve.