HomeGroupsTalkZeitgeist
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.
  • LibraryThing
  • Book discussions
  • Your LibraryThing
  • Join to start using.

Sarah Lotz

Combiners!

Join LibraryThing to post.

1verenka
Edited: Nov 8, 1:20pm Top

I just combined Sarah Lotz with S.L. Grey because Sarah Lotz is listed as an alias. Now I'm not so sure anymore so I undid the combine.

According to https://www.fantasticfiction.com/l/sarah-lotz/ S.L. Grey is not just her but another collaborator, and I'm not sure how to proceed. The same is true for her other alias, Lily Herne. That's her and her daughter. Merging the three names together seems wrong, but keeping them separate doesn't reflect the situation either.

What is the correct way to go about this?

2norabelle414
Nov 8, 1:31pm Top

I usually leave the pen name alone, with a disambiguation notice that "This is a pseudonym for the authors xx and yy", then apply both authors individually as 'other authors' to the books written by that pen name.

For an example see Magnus Flyte.

3MarthaJeanne
Nov 8, 1:47pm Top

If a pseudonym includes two people it is not the same author as either person.

4aspirit
Nov 8, 6:44pm Top

I agree with >3 MarthaJeanne:.

To link the two, you could add something like "S.L. Grey (collab)" in each of the single author's Other Names field.

5r.orrison
Edited: Nov 9, 3:48am Top

With the authors' real names in the Relationships field, they will be links to that author's page. That doesn't work for Other Names. Also, S.L. Grey isn't another name for Sarah Lotz - it's just factually incorrect.

6Maddz
Nov 9, 8:04am Top

There’s a similar situation with Jocelin Foxe and Elizabeth Eyre. Both are two people writing as a single person under a pen name.

7aspirit
Nov 9, 11:19pm Top

>5 r.orrison: you're on it. The Relationship works best in this situation.

I forget that field exists when it's empty.

8lilithcat
Edited: Nov 9, 11:27pm Top

>7 aspirit:

I don't see how you can have a "relationship" with yourself.

Frankly, I think the easiest and most logical thing is to indicate in the disambiguation field that "A" is a joint pseudonym of "X" and "Y", and make "X" and "Y" links to their individual author pages.

9Nicole_VanK
Nov 10, 9:45am Top

I agree with >8 lilithcat: on this one

10aspirit
Nov 10, 10:04am Top

The relationship with a multi-author pseudonym is a partnership.

A disambiguation notice can also be used. On its own, it doesn't create a link to the S.L. Grey author page.

11lilithcat
Nov 10, 10:53am Top

A disambiguation notice can also be used. On its own, it doesn't create a link to the S.L. Grey author page.

You can easily create a link using html.

12r.orrison
Nov 10, 11:21am Top

You can, and I can, but not everyone can. Even those that can will most likely link to the .com version of the site, which can be annoying for users of other languages.

Relationships creates the link automatically, so it's much easier for most users.

Group: Combiners!

838 members

49,895 messages

About

This topic is not marked as primarily about any work, author or other topic.

About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 139,567,033 books! | Top bar: Always visible