Under no circumstances will I ever read this "children's classic" to my grand children unless I want to drive them into deep despair. Children forever separated from their parents, some by early death, some by other circumstances, feature prominently in this story of Peter Pan's beginnings and sets a dark tone which overrides scenes of whimsy and imagination.

On the other hand, Calla Editions' pleasantly crafted volume of "Peter Pan In Kengsinton Gardens" is worth keeping for the beauty of its presentation, especially for the illustrations that are those of the original artist and king of Edwardian children's illustrations, Arthur Rackham. For Rackham fans, it is a must have. ( )

From the intro:
Never, in the history of children's literature, has there been a more enchanted combination than Arthur Rackham and Peter Pan.
-------------

I read the story over 2 decades ago when I thought I'd start with the Peter Pan story from the top but I didn't enjoy this story.

Here in 2019, I re-found the book to look at the illustrations. Many full page illustrations by the master but unfortunately the tones are more muted than they should be. Perhaps this version's printing hasn't held up well.

{novelette} ( )

Not the plot or characters of the later play by J.M Barrie. Interesting to see how the story evolved into its modern version. ( )

1926 American edition. Love, love, love these illustrations! ( )

W...T...H? Parts of it made very interesting set-ups for the canon of Peter Pan, but parts of it were definitely not appropriate for children; the last chapter deals greatly with children dying (falling out of their prams, being left to starve/freeze in the gardens, etc.) and Peter burying their dead bodies. It also mentions the "bad fairies" slaughtering children that get discovered in the gardens after closing time. This, to me, is the reason that you can't just /trust/ that a children's book is appropriate for its intended audience (this and the original Little Mermaid). ( )