HomeGroupsTalkMoreZeitgeist
Search Site
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Loading...

No title

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingMentions
1261215,209 (3.64)2
Focusing on Petersburg, Virginia, Professor Lebsock is able to demonstrate and explain how the status of women could change for the better in an antifeminist environment. She weaves the experiences of individual women together with general social trends, to show, for example, how women's lives were changing in response to the economy and the institutions of property ownership and slavery. By looking at what the Petersburg women did and thought and comparing their behavior with that of men, Lebsock discovers that they placed high value on economic security, on the personal, on the religious, and on the interests of other women. In a society committed to materialism, male dominance, and the maintenance of slavery, their influence was subversive. They operated from an alternative value system, indeed a distinct female culture.… (more)
Member:
Title:
Authors:
Info:
Collections:
Rating:
Tags:None

Work Information

The Free Women of Petersburg: Status and Culture in a Southern Town, 1784-1860 by Suzanne Lebsock

Loading...

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

» See also 2 mentions

The orthodoxy Lebsock is attacking is that women were steadily loosing their autonomy in the period between the Revolution and the Civil War. She intends to show that the opposite was true in Petersburg, VA. To accomplish this end she has examined official documents such as wills, tax collection records, and census data. Her most interesting conclusion is that "women were perfectly wiling to combine family and career when it was possible and when it paid." (xviii)

n Chapter 4, she addressed the status of "Free Women of Color." According to Lebsock, the matricentrical family was not aberrant, rather it was the norm for the majority of free black families (p. 89). May black women had chosen to stay single as a positive act of autonomy (p. 104). Many external factors came into play in their choice for black women. there was a shortage of men. Slave marriages had no legal status, thereby restricting further the pool of eligible bachelors. Marriage may also have impeded a free black woman's effort to buy relatives out of slavery by making her property vulnerable to her husband's creditors (p. 109).

In Chapter 5, Lebsock addresses the single white women of Petersburg. She finds that those women who did have property made wills more often than men, and that often they played favorites in the division of their estates. This she calls "personalism," or an attempt to redistribute wealth according to both who needed it most and who had gained favor with the deceased during her life. Mary Boling, a wealthy Petersburg widow who died shortly after the beginning of the 19th Century. is a particular example Lebsock uses to illustrate this practice (p. 116). With respect to those propertied men who died testate, most felt their wives too fragile for the duties of executorship. If given the choice of administration over their husbands' estates, however, many took on the responsibility (p. 122). Women were also more likely to hive their slaves freedom, perhaps with property, in their wills. Though they may not have been anti-slave ideologues, many women had practical experience with the institution where they showed sensitivity in the individual case (p. 143). From this, Lebsock draws the conclusion that perhaps there is something different about women, maybe a world where women ruled would be a more decent and humane one.

In Chapter 6, Lebsock addresses the nature of women's work in Petersburg. She finds that the women of Petersburg did not see housework as degrading, unlike the women of the 1940s and 1950s, because housework had not yet been trivialized (p. 163). Petersburg women made their family's clothes and grew much of its food (p. 153), and thereby gained a sense of self-worth. Women who actually went into the paid-labor market place, or became entrepreneurs did so out of economic need (p. 185). Small businesses, like that of the milliners and Mantua makers, were common occupations for women until the corporate form of business forced them out of them (p. 176). Single women with children did balance work and family in the 19th Century and they faced many of the same problems faced by women today.
  mdobe | Jul 24, 2011 |
no reviews | add a review
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
People/Characters
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Epigraph
Dedication
In memory of Mary Eisenach Lebsock and Lois Sommers Wells
First words
Quotations
Last words
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Blurbers
Original language
Canonical DDC/MDS
Canonical LCC

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English

None

Focusing on Petersburg, Virginia, Professor Lebsock is able to demonstrate and explain how the status of women could change for the better in an antifeminist environment. She weaves the experiences of individual women together with general social trends, to show, for example, how women's lives were changing in response to the economy and the institutions of property ownership and slavery. By looking at what the Petersburg women did and thought and comparing their behavior with that of men, Lebsock discovers that they placed high value on economic security, on the personal, on the religious, and on the interests of other women. In a society committed to materialism, male dominance, and the maintenance of slavery, their influence was subversive. They operated from an alternative value system, indeed a distinct female culture.

No library descriptions found.

Book description
Haiku summary

Current Discussions

None

Popular covers

Quick Links

Rating

Average: (3.64)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3 3
3.5 1
4 2
4.5
5 1

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

W.W. Norton

An edition of this book was published by W.W. Norton.

» Publisher information page

 

About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 203,189,272 books! | Top bar: Always visible