Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
Loading... Levinas: An Introduction (edition 1996)by Colin Davis
Work InformationLevinas: An Introduction by Colin Davis
None Loading...
Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. No current Talk conversations about this book. no reviews | add a review
Belongs to Series
In recent years there has been a resurgence of interest in the work of Emmanuel Levinas, widely recognized as one of the most important yet difficult philosophers of the 20th century. In this much-needed introduction, Davis unpacks the concepts at the centre of Levinas's thought - alterity, the Other, the Face, infinity - concepts which have previously presented readers with major problems of interpretation. Davis traces the development of Levinas's thought over six decades, describing the context in which he worked, and the impact of his writings. He argues that Levinas's work remains tied to the ontological tradition with which he wants to break, and demonstrates how his later writing tries to overcome this dependency by its increasingly disruptive, sometimes opaque, textual practice. He discusses Levinas's theological writings and his relationship to Judaism, as well as the reception of his work by contemporary thinkers, arguing that the influence of his work has led to a growing interest in ethical issues among poststructuralist and postmodernist thinkers in recent years. Comprehensive and clearly written, this book will be essential reading for students and researchers in continental philosophy, French studies, literary theory and theology. No library descriptions found. |
Current DiscussionsNonePopular covers
Google Books — Loading... GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)194Philosophy and Psychology Modern western philosophy French philosophersLC ClassificationRatingAverage:
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |
Anyway, this is well written, well structured, sympathetic and objective. Also, it makes me think Levinas was onto something much more impressive than I had previously thought (blame a certain famous professor from my grad-school days).
“Modern anti-humanism is right, Levinas suggests, though not entirely for the reasons it gives. It correctly abolishes the notion of the human person as the free, self-creating source of its own values; but it then fails to make Levinas’s move of reinstating subjectivity in terms of substitution and responsibility… ‘Humanism has to be denounced only because it is not sufficiently human,’ (OB, 203/128)” ( )