

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
Loading... THE SILVER CHAIR (PUFFIN BOOKS) (original 1953; edition 1970)by C. S. LEWIS
Work InformationThe Silver Chair by C. S. Lewis (1953)
![]() Best Fantasy Novels (100) 1950s (12) » 37 more Comfort Reads (29) 20th Century Literature (212) Ambleside Books (30) Top Five Books of 2013 (997) Best Young Adult (221) Books Read in 2021 (1,096) Books Read in 2023 (2,043) Nifty Fifties (17) Books Read in 2014 (1,342) Books Read in 2010 (133) Authors from Ireland (17) Books tagged favorites (365) Read in 1999 (41) Female Protagonist (997) Unread books (990) No current Talk conversations about this book. ![]() ![]() Of the seven Narnia books, my relationship with most is clear. I adore "Nephew", "Lion" and "Horse", am indifferent about "Caspian" and "Voyage", and despise "Battle. But "The Silver Chair" and I have admired and resented each other, equally, since I first read it as a kid. On the one hand... this is perhaps the most justifiably dark book in the series, as Jill and Eustace (replacing, thankfully, those tiresome Pevensie children) find their own belief in Aslan and themselves fading fast, and their uncertainty as to what to do is quite palpable. Lewis passionately makes us believe that the world of Narnia is falling apart, and references to the past stories actually are quite terrifying, in the same way that most series have to wait for their non-canonical installments (e.g. "Return to Oz") to do. It's the most literate of the seven books, also. Opposing this, of course, is the fact that all of this passion stems from Lewis making each Narnia book more and more of an aggressively Christian allegory. For "belief in Aslan" read "belief in Jesus". For "the world of Narnia is falling apart" read "the world of white, Christian living". This doesn't inherently render the book a failure - after all, Dante was of the same passion, and the Divine Comedy is a masterwork! But it does sadden me a little that my childhood nostalgia is now tainted by the knowledge that Lewis' books are pushing a strong agenda that goes beyond mere children's literature moral fables and into religious propaganda. Is that unfair? Perhaps. I'm literate enough to be able to enjoy this as a story, and be intrigued by the moral dilemmas of the characters, without hating it just because of the author's beliefs. But at the same time, I don't think kids should be going into this without an adult to guide them through the maze. It's great that Lewis was writing intelligent fiction that would make children ask questions. It's just a pity that he's already decided which answer they should arrive at. Not only is this the first book without any Pevensies, but it sure does delve into new depths (pun intended). Jill and Eustace are an interesting combination of characters—they're the first to go to Narnia who aren't related to each other in any way, not that being unrelated kept them from bickering. While parts of the story were quite predictable, I still enjoyed the way it played out. Puddleglum, though, now he's my kind of character. He expects the worst, yet never gives up. He has 100% faith in and devotion to Aslan, and I absolutely love his words and actions when facing the evil witch of this story. I really appreciate the way C.S. Lewis brings out truths about following God in the midst of these fantastical stories.
The mythical land of Narnia and the adventures one always has there are the subject of this charming book, the fourth in a series that fortunately shows no sign of ending. Is contained inHas the adaptationHas as a commentary on the textAwards
Two English children undergo hair-raising adventures as they go on a search and rescue mission for the missing Prince Rilian, who is held captive in the underground kingdom of the Emerald Witch. No library descriptions found.
|
Current DiscussionsNonePopular covers
![]() GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)813Literature English (North America) American fictionLC ClassificationRatingAverage:![]()
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |