Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
|
Loading... Thinking about the Earth: A History of Ideas in Geology (Studies in the History and Philosophy of the Earth Sciences) (1996)by David Oldroyd
   No current Talk conversations about this book.  dchaikin | Apr 21, 2020 |  no reviews | add a review
"Thinking about the Earth is a history from Antiquity to the present of ideas about the planet on which we live. Not a history of geology, it instead recounts the geological tradition of Western science, beginning with the organic earth-views of the earliest cultures and ending with the Gaia hypothesis advanced by Lovelock. After a survey of topics ranging from the mythopoetic, mechanical, and historicist views of the earth - from early maps and other representations of the earth to modern seismology and geochemistry - Oldroyd returns us to the idea that our water planet may in a sense be regarded as a living entity, or at least that life is an essential feature of its behavior. If the history of ideas about the earth can teach us one thing, Oldroyd argues, it is that interpretations are constantly changing. To suppose that interpretations currently in favor will stand for all time is, he says, an act of hubris."--Jacket. No library descriptions found. |
Current DiscussionsNonePopular covers
 Google Books — Loading...GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)551.09Natural sciences and mathematics Earth sciences & geology Geology, Hydrology Meteorology Biography; History By PlaceLC ClassificationRatingAverage: (4.5)
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wikipedia in English
1
published: 1996
format: 348 page hardcover (entire book with glossary, bibliography, index, etc is 440 pages)
acquired: 1996
read: May 1-28
rating: 4
The book for those who were wondering what a geosyncline is or was, or a miogeosyncline, or eugeosyncline, and for those wondering what the heck a Wernerian was, or what the big deal was between uniformitarianism and catastrophism. Geology, for all that it goes back to mythology, is a surprisingly young science, and not always well-given to empirical research. You collect data and then make a story. So Descartes could send out crazy ideas, and they remained influential for years, while Leibniz could write up some very creative ideas, and see them disappear and never get published until the 20th century. Because who knew what was true, and maybe the earth really had an outer crustal layer lying on a molten ocean of convection. Hooke threw projectiles at plaster balls to try to determine whether the moon's craters were impact craters or volcanoes. Someone else tried to cook limestone to see if he could generate marble. Unknowns make fascinating people.
Of course James Hutton was giving us deep time in 18th century, but Lyell wasn't providing plainly reasonable observations until the the 19th century, and he never bought into ice ages, despite the evidence all around him, covering and confusing all the other geology. Darwin waited till mid century. It's kind of amazing that geologic maps didn't exist until the 19th century, and the real intense mapping didn't get under way until well into that century (many areas weren't mapped at all until the 20th century). That plate tectonics, an earth science fundamental, wasn't worked out in any sensible and defensible way until the 1960's. Ideas that appear crazy to us today aren't very old, leaving one to wonder how fundamentally sound earth and geologic concepts are today.
The writing was maybe rough, the geological terms not exactly user friendly, but Oldroyd has put together quite a story, covering the history of science from the geologic perspective. Lovers of geology and this obscure history of science will really enjoy this. Thanks to Kevin (aka stretch) for pointing me here.
2018
https://www.librarything.com/topic/288371#6494072 (