HomeGroupsTalkMoreZeitgeist
Search Site
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Loading...

In Fact: Essays on Writers and Writing

by Thomas Mallon

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingMentions
812331,023 (4.2)1
"In Fact gathers the best of Thomas Mallon's superb criticism from the past twenty-two years - essays that appeared in his GQ column, "Doubting Thomas," and in The New York Times Book Review, The American Scholar, The New Yorker, and Harper's, among other publications. Here are his evaluations of the work of contemporary writers such as Nicholson Baker, Peter Carey, Tom Wolfe, Don DeLillo, Joan Didion, and Robert Stone, and reassessments of such earlier twentieth-century figures as John O'Hara, Sinclair Lewis, Truman Capote, and Mary McCarthy. Mallon also considers an array of odd literary genres and phenomena - including book indexes, obituaries, plagiarism, cancelled checks, fan mail, and author tours. And he turns his sharp eye on historical fiction (his own genre) as well as on the history, practice, and future of memoir."--Jacket.… (more)
None
Loading...

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

» See also 1 mention

Showing 2 of 2
Why, exactly, do people read essays? It is to get new perspectives on old ideas, new ideas on old perspectives, and to just learn new stuff. In general, the exploration of essays is the exploration of ideas. (Far too simplistic, but let’s move on.) So, why do people read essays about writers and writing? Well, in that case it is probably something a little different. If you’re a writer (which I pretend to be), it is to learn insights on how other people approach the craft. Techniques and tips aren’t the good parts (“how to’s” are not really that interesting.) It really comes down to mind sets and atmosphere. And, it is also about camaraderie – to understand that people are facing the same issues and, just maybe, approaching this craft in similarly bizarre ways. Finally, why do people read book reviews? Well, all of the previous points apply. But book reviews are much more about opinion than the average essay (or maybe they are more transparent about that opinion.) Really, why do I care what one person (someone who probably doesn’t have the same life approach I do) thinks about a book? That’s why book reviews have to be more than the three or four paragraphs you might find in this venue. They have to present a reason to be compelling, and reason to make you listen to the author.

In this collection, Thomas Mallon does an excellent job of making me care about what he has to say and, maybe more importantly, makes me want to explore the tomes that he praises (and makes me want to avoid the ones he doesn’t). The book is subtitled “Essays on Writers and Writing”, but the focus is much more on books than on writers or writing. Yes, there are essays that delve into writers and writing, but the collection contains many more actual reviews. However, that is the power in the approach that Mallon uses – even in a book review you learn about the writer, the writing, or both. He has made me want to explore books I had either not heard of or had dismissed. Shortly after reading the review of Palimpsest – Gore Vidal’s “autobiography” – I stumbled across it in the used book store and instantly picked it up. Immediately after reading his essay on Siegfried Sassoon I went to the web to find his poems. I’ve started a list of authors whose books I now want to add.

The collection has many good entries and, just as with any collection, some that don’t work. I will say that, as I read through the books, I began longing for some familiarity. (There was a brief respite when he discussed George Plimpton’s book on Truman Capote. While I haven’t read it, at least I knew a little bit about the subject.) In addition, things fall apart occasionally in the sections that are biographical or try to go other directions. (In particular, an essay about going through his father’s cancelled checks to reconstruct that father’s life didn’t work. It was obviously an important exploration for the author, but the note that was being rung went on too long.) But, these excursions into other areas also have some illuminating moments. Some of the essays owe their existence to research Mallon did for his own books, and those illuminations (in particular, some of the information on the Lincoln assassination) are very interesting and entertaining. The few bumps are worth the overall ride. You will see essays that expand your knowledge, give you new perspectives on old thoughts, and make you want to go out and read some more. ( )
  figre | Sep 18, 2008 |
Excellent collection of literary reviews and essays, especially strong on historical fiction (which Mallon writes). This is the perfect book if you were an English major but don't like academic literary criticism -- it's written for people who love to read. ( )
Showing 2 of 2
no reviews | add a review
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
People/Characters
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Epigraph
Dedication
First words
Quotations
Last words
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Blurbers
Original language
Canonical DDC/MDS
Canonical LCC

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English (1)

"In Fact gathers the best of Thomas Mallon's superb criticism from the past twenty-two years - essays that appeared in his GQ column, "Doubting Thomas," and in The New York Times Book Review, The American Scholar, The New Yorker, and Harper's, among other publications. Here are his evaluations of the work of contemporary writers such as Nicholson Baker, Peter Carey, Tom Wolfe, Don DeLillo, Joan Didion, and Robert Stone, and reassessments of such earlier twentieth-century figures as John O'Hara, Sinclair Lewis, Truman Capote, and Mary McCarthy. Mallon also considers an array of odd literary genres and phenomena - including book indexes, obituaries, plagiarism, cancelled checks, fan mail, and author tours. And he turns his sharp eye on historical fiction (his own genre) as well as on the history, practice, and future of memoir."--Jacket.

No library descriptions found.

Book description
Haiku summary

Current Discussions

None

Popular covers

Quick Links

Rating

Average: (4.2)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5 1
4 2
4.5 1
5 1

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 204,763,000 books! | Top bar: Always visible