Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
|
Loading... Commentary on Paul's Letter to Romans (1875)by Moses E. Lard
   None No current Talk conversations about this book. no reviews | add a review
This is a reproduction of a book published before 1923. This book may have occasional imperfections such as missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. that were either part of the original artifact, or were introduced by the scanning process. We believe this work is culturally important, and despite the imperfections, have elected to bring it back into print as part of our continuing commitment to the preservation of printed works worldwide. We appreciate your understanding of the imperfections in the preservation process, and hope you enjoy this valuable book. ++++ The below data was compiled from various identification fields in the bibliographic record of this title. This data is provided as an additional tool in helping to ensure edition identification: ++++ Commentary On Paul's Letter To Romans: With A Revised Greek Text, Compiled From The Best Recent Authors And A New Translation Moses Easterly Lard Transylvania Printing and Pub. Co., 1875 Bible No library descriptions found. |
Current DiscussionsNonePopular covers
 Google Books — Loading...RatingAverage: (4.25)
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wikipedia in English
1
Lard writes from a Restorationist perspective in the 19th century. He is quite familiar with many of the major commentaries on Romans in his time. He does well at maintaining conversation with other commentators and on the issues in Romans. Even if one ultimately disagrees with a given conclusion one is forced to grapple with the well-defined arguments which Lard makes.
Lard provides the Greek text and his own English translation by section; his full translation is given at the end. He gives great care to the translation of terms (although some of his decisions re: justification or righteousness are a bit difficult to accept). His interpretations feature elements which are good for people to at least consider; he will surprise you on many fronts no matter your position on various topics.
Definitely worth considering; it would be good for this to again be in print. (