HomeGroupsTalkZeitgeist
Happy Holidays! The 12 Days of LT scavenger hunt is going on. Can you solve the clues?
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.
Hide this

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

A Window in Time, Vol. 1 by Sergei…
Loading...

A Window in Time, Vol. 1

by Sergei Rachmaninoff

Other authors: Wayne Stahnke (Engineer)

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingConversations
312,842,946 (5)None
Recently added bytlbiii, cdefonso, Waldstein

None.

None
Loading...

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

A Window in Time:
Sergei Rachmaninoff (1873–1943)

[Vol. 1:] Rachmaninoff plays his solo piano works

A technological breakthrough in recreating music roll performances

realized by Wayne Stahnke


[1] Rachmaninoff: Prelude in C sharp minor, Op. 3 No. 2 [1919]
[2] Rachmaninoff: Lilacs, Op. 21 No. 5 [1922]
[3] Rimsky-Korsakov (arr. Rachmaninoff): The Flight of the Bumblebee [1929]
[4] Rachmaninoff: Elegie, Op. 3 No. 1 [1928]
[5] Rachmaninoff: Barcarolle, Op. 10 No. 3 [1919]
[6] Kreisler-Rachmaninoff: Liebesfreud [1925]
[7] Kreisler-Rachmaninoff: Liebesleid [1922]
[8] Rachmaninoff: Melodie, Op. 3 No. 3 [1919]
[9] Rachmaninoff: Etude-tableau in B minor, Op. 39 No. 4 [1928]
[10] Schubert-Rachmaninoff: Wohin? [1925]
[11] Rachmaninoff: Polichinelle, Op. 3 No. 4 [1919]
[12] Rachmaninoff: Polka de V. R. [1919]
[13] Rachmaninoff: Prelude in G minor, Op. 23 No. 5 [1919]
[14] Rachmaninoff: Serenade, Op. 3 No. 5 [1923]
[15] Bizet-Rachmaninoff: Minuet (from L'Arlesienne Suite No. 1) [1922]
[16] Mussorgsky-Rachmaninoff: Hopak (from Sorochinsky Fair) [1921]
[17] Rachmaninoff: Etude-tableau in A minor, Op. 39 No. 6 [1921]
[18] Rachmaninoff: Humoresque, Op. 10 No. 5 [1919]
[19] Traditional (arr. Rachmaninoff): The Star-Spangled Banner [1919]

Sergei Rachmaninoff, piano

Recorded: 1919-29 (piano rolls); 27 August 1996, Thousand Oaks Civic Arts Center, Los Angeles, California (Bösendorfer 290SE Reproducing Piano).

Telarc, 1998. 65:12. Liner notes by Daniel Pollock and Wayne Stahnke. Cover painting: Kazuhiko Sano.

==================================================​

Highly recommended, with a word of caution

I have to start by admitting that I don't understand all those fellows who proclaim that this is not Rachmaninoff, that these performances are ''robotic'', ''mechanic'', and other stuff like that. This is pure prejudice. But it is understandable. The very thought of listening to Rachmaninoff himself, a composer and pianist of genuine greatness, is enough to make one dizzy. But to have Rachmaninoff's own recordings in a fine digital sound, that does seem too good to be true. Well, it is and it isn't.

The source of the prejudice, I think, is two-fold: the sound and the processing. The latter is meticulously explained by Wayne Stahnke in the liner notes and it is a very complicated process which involved scanning of the original rolls and playing them on Bösendorfer digital reproducing piano. Apart from Mr Stahnke's purely technical details, many of which I confess I don't understand, his most important point is that these rolls were not originally made for the notorious ''player piano'', a wretched device that has given a bad name to piano rolls as completely incapable of reproducing the real sound of a pianist, but for reproducing piano: a far more sophisticated (and far more expensive) device which is able to reproduce every detail, even subtle nuances like pedalling. Such an instrument Mr Stahnke's digital Bösendorfer was, only it played, not mechanical rolls, but computer files. This is enough to make one suspicious. Digital Rachmaninoff, indeed!

As for the sound here, it has clarity and presence, to say nothing of amount of detail or dynamic range, which makes it absolutely impossible to believe that these recordings were originally made between 1919 and 1929, and on such primitive mechanical recording device as piano rolls. And yes, many subtle nuances and colours are retained and can be appreciated as in very few (if any) acoustical, or even electrical, recordings from those times. Switching from this ''Window in Time'' to RCA's version of it is a shock. Believe me, I know. This disc was my introduction to Rachmaninoff's playing and when I later came to his sound recordings, I was profoundly dismayed by the infinitely inferior sound.

In his otherwise indifferent essay in the booklet, Daniel Pollock at least once hits the nail on the head: we are fortunate to have both Rachmaninoff's sound recordings and his piano rolls. The emphasis is mine. If the former were missing, I readily confess that I would have been most suspicious and would never have accepted these glassy digital recordings as authentic. Well, authentic they are and aren't, but the former much more so than the latter. This is absolutely clear to anybody who takes the trouble to do some comparative analysis – and free his head from stupid preconceptions.

There are 19 pieces on this disc, and 16 them Rachmaninoff recorded for RCA as well, acoustically or electrically, usually with a gap of no more than a few years. Keeping in mind that Rachmaninoff is well-known for the conservative nature of his interpretations, which did change but a little with the passing years, the comparison between his piano rolls and sound recordings is more than valid. Well, such comparison shows beyond any reasonable doubt that at least 16 pieces of this disc are Rachmaninoff par excellence. His interpretation of virtually every piece is so unique that you can't possibly make a mistake. Despite the jarring difference in the sound quality, these digitally reproduced piano rolls sound incredibly similar to Rachmaninoff's sound recordings. There are some differences, of course, but they are so minor and insignificant that they are not worth dwelling upon. Nor is the reason for them of any importance.

Many of these recordings are pure revelations. Take, for example, the famous G minor prelude (Op. 23 No. 5), the haunting ''Barcarolle'' (Op. 10 No. 3) or the slightly sinister ''Polichinelle'' (Op. 3 No. 4). Rachmaninoff's sound recordings of these pieces are acoustical ones made between 1919 and 1923, before the much better electrical recordings were introduced in 1925; besides, these pieces have some of the worst sound in his whole discography and were never re-recorded later. Nevertheless, the sound recordings are quite good enough to recognise Rachmaninoff in these piano rolls. And to hear the crisp march-like rhythm in the beginning of the G minor prelude or the astonishing passage work in ''Polichinelle'' is indeed a revelation that may well leave you with your jaw dropped. Even some of Rachmaninoff's early electrical recordings, such as his own transcription of the ''Hopak'' from Mussorgsky's Sorochinsky Fair (recorded in 1925), are disappointingly subpar even for those ancient times. Hear the ''Hopak'' here: it will blow you away!

I mentioned a word of caution in the title and now I have to explain what I mean. In a nutshell, though all interpretations on this disc are unmistakably Rachmaninoff's own, the sound certainly is not. There may be numerous reasons for that – this is a digital Bösendorfer, Rachmaninoff recorded mostly on Steinway concert grand, for instance – but this is beside the point. The fact is that, for all its astounding clarity of detail and fine dynamic range, the digital sound here is a trifle dry and has little to do with Rachmaninoff's own (literally) sonority which, for all of their severe limitations, is quite evident in almost all of his sound recordings, including the acoustical ones.

So, if you want to fully appreciate Rachmaninoff's towering pianism, you really should listen both to his sound recordings and to such marvellously reproduced piano rolls. The latter will give many precious details that are otherwise difficult to discern, whereas the former will give you the real and authentic sound of Rachmaninoff. Yes, the background noise, the limited dynamic range and the often distorted sound do need some time to get used to them. But once you have done so, there is a whole new world to explore.

For my part, in spite of many comparative revelations, the most important pieces on this disc remain the three that Rachmaninoff never made sound recordings of: his own transcription of ''The Star-Spangled Banner'', and two of his own compositions, Etude-tableau Op. 39 No. 4 and ''Elegie'' Op. 3 No. 1. Having compared all ''double pieces'', I have no hesitation to accept these interpretations as absolutely artistically, if not sonically, authentic. The ''Elegie'' is a gem, truly affecting without being in the least affected, and it’s one of my greatest regrets that Rachmaninoff never made a sound recording of it (he did record all four other pieces from Op. 3, some of them multiple times). It is an astonishing piece for a 19-year-old man to compose, showing convincingly that Rachmaninoff was already a mature composer at the time. His performance, of course, is significantly faster than what is fashionable nowadays, but the beautiful melodic line is never distorted, nor the profound sadness of the piece diminished.

All in all, this disc is a downright amazing technological achievement and an indispensable addition to the shelves of every serious admirer of Rachmaninoff. But keep in mind that without his complete sound recordings for RCA, you will never have the full picture, both sonically and artistically, of Rachmaninoff's real stature as a pianist. At least as far as this picture can be reconstructed from the little that's left. ( )
  Waldstein | Oct 29, 2017 |
no reviews | add a review

» Add other authors

Author nameRoleType of authorWork?Status
Sergei Rachmaninoffprimary authorall editionscalculated
Stahnke, WayneEngineersecondary authorall editionsconfirmed
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Series (with order)
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
People/Characters
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Awards and honors
Epigraph
Dedication
First words
Quotations
Last words
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Blurbers
Publisher series
Original language
Canonical DDC/MDS

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English

None

Book description
Haiku summary

No descriptions found.

No library descriptions found.

Quick Links

Popular covers

Rating

Average: (5)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5 1

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 130,799,614 books! | Top bar: Always visible