Happy Holidays! The 12 Days of LT scavenger hunt is going on. Can you solve the clues?
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.
Hide this

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

On Democracy (Yale Nota Bene) by Robert A.…

On Democracy (Yale Nota Bene) (original 1998; edition 2000)

by Robert A. Dahl (Author)

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingConversations
313351,664 (3.71)None
Title:On Democracy (Yale Nota Bene)
Authors:Robert A. Dahl (Author)
Info:Yale University Press (2000), Edition: 1, 224 pages
Collections:Your library, Books
Tags:Books, American Writer, American Nonfiction, Nonfiction, Politics, Political Sciences, Social Sciences, Democracy

Work details

On Democracy by Robert A. Dahl (Author) (1998)



Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

Showing 3 of 3
Brief summary of democratic theory. Differences between the ideal and what we get in reality.

In Dahl's view, no government in the world has lived up to the Platonic ideal of Democracy, but some have made significant progress in both the number of democracies and the expansion of the electorate in the latter half of the 20th century. Talks about the legal and philosophical justifications of equality, of course given the fact that no two people are identical nor equal.

What factors constitute an actual democracy?

1) Elected officials
2) Free, fair, and frequent elections
3) Freedom of expression
4) Alternative sources of information
5) Associational autonomy
6) Inclusive citizenship

For our example, the United States, 2 may be modestly disputed owing to the massive financial requirements needed to conduct a successful political campaign, especially after the Citizens United case, and Factor 4 as well, owing to the monopolistic views of corporate media. Although there is progress on the latter, with alternative internet and media sources gaining traction against the old hegemonic TV stations.

By contrast, Putin's Russia is more non-democratic, with 2, 3, 4, and 5 under heavy restrictions.

A brief and informative summary of democracy studies. Although such statements may seem so obvious they are almost pablum to most Americans, they are still valuable concepts which earn much from further study. ( )
  HadriantheBlind | Mar 30, 2013 |
Dahl is at Yale at a top Ivy League Department. Issues of Democracy affect us all, this is a guy and a book to start one's learning. ( )
  wonderperson | Mar 29, 2013 |
For the most part this was pretty much what you'd expect --- a definition of democracy, a defence of the idea, and a description of various practical implementations.
My main disappointment is that the various practical implementations are given so little space, after so much space is devoted to the (IMHO far less interesting) defence of democracy.

The most interesting idea I learned from the book is that representative democracy is a fairly new (late 1700s) idea that is apparently not obvious, and that was considered (perhaps justifiably) to be one of the greatest inventions of the age.

Along similar lines was that it took the US constitutional congress two months to come up with the idea of an elected president to run the executive (as opposed to the British equivalent of a monarch); for example one idea floated was that of an elected monarch (ie, I guess, president-for-life).
It could certainly be argued that mistakes were made in this regard. The unitary US presidency, defined as both the (non-political) head of state and the (intensely political) head of government, and, in practice, also the head of a political party, does not seem to provide a mechanism in the system for a person generally respected, mostly apolitical, but able to act in moments of crisis in ways generally considered to be in the nation's best interests (for a recent example, consider the King of Thailand). Dahl does not discuss this sort of issue, but I think he should have.

Also interesting was a binning of democratic political systems into four main groups:
* European : parliament + proportional representation
* UK : parliament + first pass the post
* US : president + first pass the post (he doesn't like this)
* South American: president + proportional representation (he thinks this is really bad)
This is the sort of political "science" I want to learn more about, and I wish he'd concentrated more on this sort of thing. ( )
  name99 | Nov 13, 2006 |
Showing 3 of 3
no reviews | add a review
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Series (with order)
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Awards and honors
First words
Last words
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Publisher series
Original language
Canonical DDC/MDS

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English (1)

Book description
Dans une démarche éminemment didactique , Robert Dahl pose des questions essentielles et tente d'y répondre . Avec rigueur et clarté, à l'aide de nombreux encadrés explicitant le vocabulaire de la démocratie , il entraîne le lecteur dans une exploration systématique de la démocratie dans l'histoire et dans le monde.
Haiku summary

Amazon.com Amazon.com Review (ISBN 0300084552, Paperback)

"Democracy has been discussed off and on for about twenty-five hundred years, enough time to provide a tidy set of ideas about democracy on which everyone, or nearly everyone, could agree. For better or worse, that is not the case."

Freshman poly-sci instructors need fret no longer, however; as an introduction to democratic principles, Robert A. Dahl's On Democracy is rather tidy, indeed. Dahl, an emeritus professor of political science at Yale, covers questions like "Where and how did democracy develop?" in accessible--almost chatty--prose, often taking the time to say a few "words about words," in which he examines, for example, the historical connotations of "democracy" and "republic" (it turns out that until James Madison declared there was a political distinction to be made, the only difference between the two was their etymological roots). Experienced readers may find their eyes glazing over at pronouncements such as "Democratic institutions are less likely to develop in a country subject to intervention by another country hostile to democracy in that country," but if you're looking for a comprehensive yet brief overview of how democracy works, On Democracy fits the bill.

(retrieved from Amazon Thu, 12 Mar 2015 18:08:25 -0400)

(see all 3 descriptions)

No library descriptions found.

Quick Links

Popular covers


Average: (3.71)
1 1
1.5 1
2 1
3 10
3.5 1
4 5
4.5 1
5 9

Yale University Press

2 editions of this book were published by Yale University Press.

Editions: 0300084552, 0300076274

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.


About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 130,867,689 books! | Top bar: Always visible