Another sharp, clean tiny biography from the Great Discoveries series. Johnson leverages every scrap of documentation maximally and ultimately runs up against the limits of the record (he squeezes a few good paragraphs out of census forms). Still, a job well done: I know what Leavitt did and perhaps as much about herself as can be known (not much, really). ( )

Partial detailed review.

Prologue: The village in the canyon.
A metaphor for the astronomer's difficulty in calculating the distance to any star.

Chapter 1: Black Stars, White NIghts
Why the white nights? Does he mean white skies? Sets up the problem. How do we know, or believe that we know, the distance to the next galaxy over? Discusses early astronomy and fast forwards to the establishment of the Harvard observatory and its large refracting telescope. Then comes the union of astronomy and photography. Discusses the techniques involved in comparing the brightness of an individual star over time to detect variability. Remarks on the population of women who catalogued the stars. Is not that clear about how many there were or for how long this situation lasted.

Chapter 2: Hunting for Variables
Chapter 3: Henrietta's Law
Little is known about Henrietta Leavitt. But after graduating from Radcliffe we find her working as an unpaid assistant at the observatory. Then she spends two years traveling in Europe. Then she goes to her father's place in Beloit, Wisconsin. Then she suggests to Pickering that he employ her. He does, but there are numerous false starts and delays as she is chronically unhealthy and caught up with family obligations. She observes the relation between the period and the brightness of the stars in the Magellanic Clouds and over the space of years works to refine the data. All this is really puzzling. Leavitt was not a computer who worked constantly at the observatory, she was as often far away and getting work sent to her by Pickering. Why didn't he give up on her, with all her delays and illness? It is so hard to understand.

Chapter 4: Triangles
Using parallax, and lots of math, to calculate the distances to stars. A story of an ever expanding baseline. The diameter of the earth is big enough to allow a reasonable calculation of the distance to the moon. And, once the AU was known, the diameter of the earth's orbit will allow calculation of the distances to nearby stars. Proxima Centauri is only four light years away. Since all the Cepheid variables were too far away for their distance to be determined by parallax, astronomers were back to the same situation as they had been with the AU before the transit of Venus measurements; they knew the distance to various stars only in terms of the unknown distance to the Small Magellanic Clouds. But, over the course of years the sun travels and the earth with it, and this gives another baseline, which can be longer than the earth's orbit. Ejnar Hertzsprung takes a stab at this technique and puts the distance to the Small Magellanic Clouds as 30,000 light years. In 1914 Leavitt publishes her completed work on the North Polar Sequence.

Chapter 5: Shapley's Ants
Herschel believes that nebulae may be other galaxies, Laplace is convinced that they are local star factories. Now we know that both are right; some nebulae are other galaxies and others are local star factories. Photography finds 100,000 or so of these nebulae. In 1914, Slipher, at the Lowell Observatory, uses red shift to estimate velocity of nebulae and finds that these things are receding rapidly, 1000 km/second, some of them. Heber Curtis uses super-novae as standard candles, and estimates that the nebulae are millions of light years away. In 1914 it is generally believed that the Milky Way is 25,000 light years long and about a quarter that wide, and that the solar system is near the center. Shapley uses Doppler effect and statistics to estimate the transverse velocity of some stars; that, compared with their perceived velocity from earth, provides an estimate of their distance. By various, rather reckless methods, Shapley calculates the diameter of the Milky Way at about 300,000 light years. Another astronomer calculates the rotational velocity of some galaxies based on estimates of their size and distance and is forced to conclude that their outer stars are moving faster than the speed of light. This can't be true, so the galaxies must be closer and smaller than was previously estimated. Shapley changes his mind and decided that there is only one galaxy, the Milky Way, and all the nebulae lie within it. Shapley notices that the Milky Way is denser toward Sagittarius and concluded that the center of the Milky Way must lie over there somewhere.

In the remaining chapters the astronomers who took Leavitt's work and ran with it are introduced.

Unfortunately, Henrietta Swan Leavitt's story remains untold, for reasons the author himself notes: there are few sources to consult. Thus, Johnson has written not a book about Henrietta Levitt, the discoverer of the astronomical period-luminosity relationship but, indeed, one about "her" stars. Not biographical except in the sense of describing the context of her life, this slim volume cannot accomplish what I take to have been Johnson's goal, to lift this woman of science out of the footnotes of the History of Science and onto the page. ( )

Did not learn much new as Miss Leavitt did not leave much behind after her death other than a few letters and notes. The other did a good job of esplaining why her work was important. ( )

Written by New York Times science reporter George Johnson, this book is not a biography because there is so little information about Leavitt to write a complete biography. Instead Johnson explains the science and math of astronomy and what Leavitt worked with at Harvard in the early 1900s. Her discovery created a "cosmic yardstick" to measure the universe leading to additional discoveries by later scientists.

I confess I was somewhat lost in the science of island universes and the inverse square law. I expected to learn more about Leavitt's personal life and education as well as struggles in her career as a "computer". But the author notes that she did not leave diaries, letters or journals from which to gather this information so very little of the book is a biography per se. It only makes me want to find out more. The book was well written but just over my head and I struggled with all the math so I rated it 3 stars more on my shortcomings than on the authors. ( )