Both the title and the summary made promises which were unfortunately not kept throughout the book. Although most of the arguments posed are certainly agreeable (the evil is in the eyes of the beholder, to summarize quite brutally), the science part of it is very weak and only limited to anecdotal references or poorly cited studies (except for a few authors - whose shiny comments appear on the cover - the writer cites extensively). It's a nice read for a young non-scientist audience (a more mature reader would find nothing really new in this book), but definitely not for someone who wants to dig deeper in the issue without searching for tons of scientific articles. ( )

Very interesting and accesible work, asking the question "What is Evil"? The author confronts our comfortable conviction trhat only Other People can be evil - and looks at the ease with which we, too, excuse our own actions.
From people "ignoring" someone in distress; "just following orders" (to commit atrocities with a clean conscience)...or swayed by money or desire into unconscionable actions. How Groupthink can cause a kind of mass psychosis Dehumanising people allows us to mistreat them as lesser beings.. How we ward off scary thoughts by blaming the victim ("she only got raped because of her behavior- it wouldnt happen to someone like me!". Internet trolls; paedophiles; "creepy" types (what even IS "creepy"?)...
She concludes that we should "top calling people or behaviors or events "evil". It ignores the important nuances of the underlying behaviors."
Well written. ( )

I truly enjoy when a book makes me look at something from an entirely different angle. I may still not agree with the point, but I'll always appreciate the view.

This book does that.

I know another reviewer took exception to the fact that the author tries to humanize pedophiles. Trust me, I'm the first one to get angry at anyone that preys on children, but I feel the reviewer got lost in their own feelings and didn't completely catch the point the author made. And no, she's not sympathetic toward pedophiles any more than she's sympathetic to rapists and murderers. Not at all.

And that's what I mean...the author just takes you down a different path of understanding, to determine what, exactly, is evil.

And I, for one, appreciated it. Great, thought-provoking, discussion-provoking book. ( )

What is evil? What makes certain choices and actions evil? Does evil exist independently? Or does it need an opposite...good...to manifest? Is evil subjective....or universal?

Dr. Julia Shaw takes a close in-depth look at evil in her new book. But this isn't the sort of book that most might expect. It isn't a bloody dissection of evil behavior in detail, or a discussion of pros and cons about punishment or treatment for those who commit serious acts of violence or crime. Dr. Shaw instead looks at the science behind human behavior. She points out in her introduction that her book is NOT about philosophy, morality, religious views or about punishment/consequences for aberrant behavior....it's about WHY human beings do the things they do, what in the makeup of human beings allows violent or evil choices, and what behaviors seem to be present in a person to make them capable of evil. Dr. Shaw breaks down the wide concept of "Evil'' into smaller pieces, using science to explain human behavior.

I read my way through this tome about the nature of evil slowly and thoughtfully. I wanted to give my brain time to formulate its opinions on Dr. Shaw's theories. For me, the idea that any human being can be capable of evil in certain situations is chilling and disturbing. I'm not saying that it isn't true....I'm saying that it is a rough revelation. We all want to see ourselves as the "good'' separated from those we see as "evil'' -- murderers, rapists, criminals, pedophiles, etc. But are we really separate? Interesting theories. Very interesting facts and explanations. Definitely thought provoking, but also disturbing. I had a hard time getting through the entire book. Not because I didn't like it or believe it...but because there is a lot of hard truth and a lot to digest/think over.

This book has definitely started some interesting discussions in our household....my husband and I are still debating what we think about the nature of evil and what situations might lead us to make an "evil'' choice. We had a long discussion this morning about how we perceive those who commit evil acts...do we see them as a person who committed an evil act...or do we judge them as an intrinsically evil person. Are there levels of evil? Are there really "evil'' people...and can "evil'' people have portions of themselves that are good? I think this book is going to be spurring debate in my household for some time to come. Healthy debate is a good thing!

Evil: The Science Behind Humanity's Dark Side hits on some rough subjects -- sadism, murder, deviance, group violence, terrorism, effects of technology/the internet and others.

I have respect for Dr. Shaw's education and her theories. I did my best to understand her points, although my educational background is not in psychology. But I think at times she goes a step or so too far....maybe tries to make things a bit too clinical? I haven't thought over it enough to know if I think that way because she actually does go too far, or if her straight forward opinions about our tendencies to be judgmental make me uncomfortable. Food for thought...and discussion...

All in all, I liked this book because it really made me think. I don't necessarily agree with all of Dr. Shaw's points, but I'm at least willing to seriously think it over and try to wrap my mind around it.

**I voluntarily read an advanced readers copy of this book from Abrams Press via NetGalley. All opinions expressed are entirely my own.** ( )

2020

https://www.librarything.com/topic/315313#7091257 ( )