HomeGroupsTalkZeitgeist
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.
Hide this

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

The privilege of pain by Caroline Kane Mills…
Loading...

The privilege of pain (1920)

by Caroline Kane Mills Everett

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingMentions
115,550,211 (2.5)1
Recently added byPetroglyph

No tags.

None.

None
Loading...

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

» See also 1 mention

This booklet, published in 1920, is the expanded version of a lecture earlier delivered by the author, Caroline Kane Mills Everett (or, as the title page has it, Mrs. Leo Everett). In it, she argues that physical disabilities, illnesses, handicaps, missing limbs, blindness, and the like, should not really matter in how people are judged. For, “while civilization has undoubtedly undermined our physique, it has also abolished the circumstances which made strength and endurance the supreme necessities of the battle of life.”

Most of the chapters in this booklet are lists of famous people from history (soldiers, philosophers, poets, novelists, statesmen, musicians, protestant reformers) who are known to have been sickly, disabled or otherwise physically impaired. Interspersed among these are more meaty chapters, where Everett makes the substantial points of her essay.

It is not a perfect text. Style-wise, mere listings are tedious. And I have a few more issues with this almost 100-year-old text: the viewpoint is positivist and optimistic about the upward trend of civilization; the perspective is entirely Christian; Urban Americans are contrasted with Australian bushwomen. But the genesis of this text lies in a medical doctor’s casually discarding of physically non-fit people in general and female soldiers in specific: “mental and moral man gets his strength and efficiency only from the physical man. A sick man, just as a sick race, is the one that goes to the wall.” Everett, thinking of the countless disabled World War veterans, took issue with that, and produced this text. As an angry response, I can appreciate it.

And I can also get behind the central message, which is that, given a society where physical strength and fitness are not the pinnacle of human achievement, “[n]o physical disablement is a barrier to achievement.” ( )
1 vote Petroglyph | Jan 15, 2019 |
no reviews | add a review
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Series (with order)
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
People/Characters
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Awards and honors
Epigraph
Dedication
To my cousin
Belle Hunnewell
First words
Quotations
Last words
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Blurbers
Publisher series
Original language
Canonical DDC/MDS

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English

None

Book description
Haiku summary

No descriptions found.

No library descriptions found.

Quick Links

Popular covers

Rating

Average: (2.5)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5 1
3
3.5
4
4.5
5

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 133,341,413 books! | Top bar: Always visible