HomeGroupsTalkMoreZeitgeist
Search Site
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Loading...

How Science Proved Edward de Vere Was William Shakespeare

by David L. Roper

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingConversations
3None4,118,705NoneNone
This book describes in detail the ground-breaking discovery concerning William Shakespeare's real identity, which has been the subject of a recent scientific investigation. Its conclusive result appears in this updated second edition of How Science Proved Edward de Vere was William Shakespeare, by providing irrefutable proof that the 17th Earl of Oxford himself, admitted to having been compelled by Queen Elizabeth I and her first minister Lord Burghley to use the name William Shakespeare as his penname. As a matter of national security, his penname and literary work were both incorporated into the otherwise vacant life of William Shakspere, a resident of Stratford-upon-Avon, a hundred miles distant from London; thereby avoiding a threatened scandal in the Queen's court becoming public knowledge. Combined with the savage recriminations for disobeying censorship at that time, the ruse was a success. And William Shakspere as Shakespeare became grafted onto the line of Tudor history that has survived for more than four centuries. Contemporaries of the Earl of Oxford secretly rebelled at this injustice to English literature by joining with him to bequeath the truth of his authorship to a future generation. The media they used were Oxford's Sonnet 76, his poem as Ignoto in Spenser's Faerie Queene, Thomas Nashe's Strange Newes, and Ben Jonson's opening poem in the First Folio, then in the inscription on the Stratford Monument, and thirdly the verse he composed for Shakspere's Gravestone; to these were added Thomas Thorpe's Dedication prefacing Shake-speares Sonnets, Leonard Digges's Tribute to William Shake-speare, William Marshall's Poem accompanying his illustration of Shakespeare, John Benson's Letter to the Reader in his poems by Wil. Shakespeare Gent, and Sir Aston Cokaine's Dedication in his book of poems. All have one thing in common. They were written in cipher-text using steganography, and employing the same code word, defined as 'Whisper, secret talk'. Seen together, with all having the same key of seventeen, this, in unison, unlocks their secret acclamation: William Shakespeare was Edward de Vere.… (more)
Recently added byafs.ddaw, proximity1, jlbattis
None
Loading...

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

No reviews
no reviews | add a review
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
People/Characters
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Epigraph
Dedication
First words
Quotations
Last words
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Blurbers
Original language
Canonical DDC/MDS
Canonical LCC

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English

None

This book describes in detail the ground-breaking discovery concerning William Shakespeare's real identity, which has been the subject of a recent scientific investigation. Its conclusive result appears in this updated second edition of How Science Proved Edward de Vere was William Shakespeare, by providing irrefutable proof that the 17th Earl of Oxford himself, admitted to having been compelled by Queen Elizabeth I and her first minister Lord Burghley to use the name William Shakespeare as his penname. As a matter of national security, his penname and literary work were both incorporated into the otherwise vacant life of William Shakspere, a resident of Stratford-upon-Avon, a hundred miles distant from London; thereby avoiding a threatened scandal in the Queen's court becoming public knowledge. Combined with the savage recriminations for disobeying censorship at that time, the ruse was a success. And William Shakspere as Shakespeare became grafted onto the line of Tudor history that has survived for more than four centuries. Contemporaries of the Earl of Oxford secretly rebelled at this injustice to English literature by joining with him to bequeath the truth of his authorship to a future generation. The media they used were Oxford's Sonnet 76, his poem as Ignoto in Spenser's Faerie Queene, Thomas Nashe's Strange Newes, and Ben Jonson's opening poem in the First Folio, then in the inscription on the Stratford Monument, and thirdly the verse he composed for Shakspere's Gravestone; to these were added Thomas Thorpe's Dedication prefacing Shake-speares Sonnets, Leonard Digges's Tribute to William Shake-speare, William Marshall's Poem accompanying his illustration of Shakespeare, John Benson's Letter to the Reader in his poems by Wil. Shakespeare Gent, and Sir Aston Cokaine's Dedication in his book of poems. All have one thing in common. They were written in cipher-text using steganography, and employing the same code word, defined as 'Whisper, secret talk'. Seen together, with all having the same key of seventeen, this, in unison, unlocks their secret acclamation: William Shakespeare was Edward de Vere.

No library descriptions found.

Book description
Haiku summary

Current Discussions

None

Popular covers

Quick Links

Rating

Average: No ratings.

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 204,507,917 books! | Top bar: Always visible