Nobody's Child: A Tragedy, a Trial, and a History of the Insanity Defense
by Susan Vinocour
On This Page
Description
"A powerful and humane exploration of the "insanity defense," through one heartbreaking case. A three-year-old boy dies, having apparently fallen while trying to reach a bag of sugar on a high shelf. His grandmother stands accused of second-degree murder. Psychologist Susan Nordin Vinocour agrees to evaluate the defendant, to determine whether the impoverished and mentally ill woman is competent to stand trial. Vinocour soon finds herself pulled headlong into a series of difficult questions, show more beginning with: Was the defendant legally insane on the night in question? As she wades deeper into the story, Vinocour traces the legal definition of insanity back nearly two hundred years, when our understanding of the human mind was in its infancy. "Competency" and "insanity," she explains, are creatures of legal definition, not psychiatric reality, and in criminal law, "insanity" has become a luxury of the rich and white. With passion, clarity, and heart, Vinocour examines the troubling intersection of mental health issues and the law"-- show lessTags
Recommendations
Member Reviews
This was heartbreaking and enraging. The author has worked both as a lawyer and as a forensic psychologist, and her dual background makes this book possible. It's the story of both a single trial--of a black woman accused of abusing and killing her grandson--and of the insanity defense, which is widely misunderstood.
The defendant's story is one of incredible systemic failure on the part of multiple agencies. Raymie died not just because of either his grandmother's actions or an accident, but because authorities had repeatedly failed to notice or provide support for a family that was failing--generations of abuse, poverty, mental illness, and intellectual disability. He was sent to live with a grandmother who warned CPS that she was not show more able to take care of him because of the needs of her other children. We often hear, these days, about CPS overinvolvement in the lives of families of color. But CPS also has repeatedly failed to intervene in cases where lives were at risk, and this was one such case.
The legal system, especially since Reagan's crusade against the insanity defense following his shooting by Hinckley, has been tilted against defendants with mental illness. The public misunderstands the insanity defense, thinking it's used far more often than it is, that it lets defendants off the hook, and that a defendant may, after being declared not guilty by reason of insanity, walk out of a hospital shortly after. (I know someone who has worked in forensic psychiatric hospitals; they are not pleasant places.) Dr. Vinocour does an interesting job of explaining the history of the defense and the legal differences between knowing an action is wrong, and understanding it. The system is also tilted against poor defendants, especially those of color. The combination is the perfect storm of injustice.
The language could, in a few places, have been toned down slightly--there are a few clichés. But it's an absorbing and well written story. show less
The defendant's story is one of incredible systemic failure on the part of multiple agencies. Raymie died not just because of either his grandmother's actions or an accident, but because authorities had repeatedly failed to notice or provide support for a family that was failing--generations of abuse, poverty, mental illness, and intellectual disability. He was sent to live with a grandmother who warned CPS that she was not show more able to take care of him because of the needs of her other children. We often hear, these days, about CPS overinvolvement in the lives of families of color. But CPS also has repeatedly failed to intervene in cases where lives were at risk, and this was one such case.
The legal system, especially since Reagan's crusade against the insanity defense following his shooting by Hinckley, has been tilted against defendants with mental illness. The public misunderstands the insanity defense, thinking it's used far more often than it is, that it lets defendants off the hook, and that a defendant may, after being declared not guilty by reason of insanity, walk out of a hospital shortly after. (I know someone who has worked in forensic psychiatric hospitals; they are not pleasant places.) Dr. Vinocour does an interesting job of explaining the history of the defense and the legal differences between knowing an action is wrong, and understanding it. The system is also tilted against poor defendants, especially those of color. The combination is the perfect storm of injustice.
The language could, in a few places, have been toned down slightly--there are a few clichés. But it's an absorbing and well written story. show less
Ratings
Members
- Recently Added By
Author Information
1 Work 26 Members
Classifications
Statistics
- Members
- 26
- Popularity
- 1,036,864
- Reviews
- 1
- Rating
- (4.50)
- Languages
- English
- Media
- Paper, Audiobook, Ebook
- ISBNs
- 3
- ASINs
- 1





















































