HomeGroupsTalkMoreZeitgeist
Search Site
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Loading...

The Sand Creek Massacre (1961)

by Stan Hoig

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingConversations
693380,533 (3.6)None
Sometimes called "The Chivington Massacre" by those who would emphasize his responsibility for the attack and "The Battle of Sand Creek" by those who would imply that it was not a massacre, this event has become one of our nations most controversial Indian conflicts. The subject of army and Congressional investigations and inquiries, a matter of vigorous newspaper debates, the object of much oratory and writing biased in both directions, the Sand Creek Massacre very likely will never be completely and satisfactorily resolved. This account of the massacre investigates the historical events leading to the battle, tracing the growth of the Indian-white conflict in Colorado Territory. The author has shown the way in which the discontent stemming from the treaty of Fort Wise, the depredations committed by the Cheyennes and Arapahoes prior to the massacre, and the desire of some of the commanding officers for a bloody victory against the Indians laid the groundwork for the battle at Sand Creek.… (more)
None
Loading...

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

Showing 3 of 3
An older book (1961); given that date I might have expected apology or justification for the massacre; however, if anything this account makes Colonel Chivington and the Third Regiment of the Colorado Volunteer Cavalry look even worse. Author Stan Hoig gives a lot of background; the actual massacre account is almost an anticlimax, not described until the last chapter.

Relations between the Cheyenne/Arapahoe and white settlers in Colorado had always been problematic; with neither side understanding the other. Regular army soldiers were withdrawn from the frontier, with locals expected to take up the slack; unfortunately, they did this with more enthusiasm than judgement. There was a gradual escalation by both sides; some white men molested some native women; some natives stole some horses; a Cheyenne was shot and killed trying to steal whiskey; Arapahos killed a ranch family and their bodies were brought to Denver for display. This last event inflamed white opinion; the dead included two little children whose throats had been cut. In the meantime, a band of raiders from Texas entered Colorado, ostensibly to recruit for the Confederacy; however, the “Reynolds Gang” quickly turned to bank and stagecoach robbery. Some were eventually caught; Colonel Chivington convinced the local marshal that they were Confederate guerillas and therefore subject to military law. Chivington got to show his character; after a military tribunal the five bandits/guerillas/whatever were supposed to be sent to Fort Lyon but the military escort received orders to “leave them on the prairie” and they were summarily executed – officially “shot trying to escape”.

In the meantime, Territorial Governor Evans sent out a proclamation ordering “peaceful Indians” to gather at various forts and warned that natives not coming in would be considered hostile. Various rumors spread that the Cheyenne and Arapahoe were massing to “wipe out the whites”, and a third regiment of Colorado Volunteer Cavalry was raised. To “facilitate enlistment” Chivington declared martial law, closed all the stores in Denver and forbade anyone to leave the territory. The resulting Third Colorado Volunteer Cavalry Regiment was “100-day men”, and quickly acquired the nickname “The Bloodless Third” because they hadn’t seen any action. This combination – a genuine Indian atrocity, a bigoted and bloodthirsty commander, a group of bored “soldiers” who had minimal training and whose manhood had been insulted by the implication that they were cowards, a governor who hadn’t coordinated Indian policy with his military commander, and camps of Plains Indians who had no clue about white politics, led to disaster.

Chivington’s troops arrived early in the morning, unlimbered cannon, and formed a firing line. Cheyenne and Arapaho waved white and American flags, to no avail. Some warriors escaped; the soldiers moved among the remainder, scalping, cutting off various body parts for souvenirs and using a fleeing toddler for target practice. Not all the soldiers responded this way; Captain Silas Soule, commanding Company D, ordered his troops to hold their fire and voiced his disgust against Chivington at a later hearing. Soule was shot and killed on the street in Denver a short time after this; his murderer was captured – but escaped.

I found the book an easy read and unbiased, especially considering it was written at a time when America’s past still hadn’t caught up to the present. Extensive footnotes, good maps, and a bibliography (although now dated).

My previous reading – outside of bits and pieces in various more general books about Colorado and Civil War history – was Finding Sand Creek, about archaeological evidence at the site (note that these authors, with the benefit of field research, locate the site slightly distant from the traditional spot used by Hoig). The site’s now a National Monument; the Cheyenne and Arapaho hold an annual 173-mile “healing run” (open to all ethnicities) from here to Denver, pausing to honor Captain Silas Soule at the street corner where he was shot down. (If you find yourself wanting to visit, note that the eastern Colorado climate means there are a lot of “Sand Creeks”; make sure you get the right one). ( )
3 vote setnahkt | Jun 1, 2021 |
While this book is a definitive basic history of the Sand Creek Massacre, it is very dry and leaves out details I know are part of the full story of this event, verifiable details that made it into other accounts but not into this book. I appreciated that this author tried to give Chivington a fair understanding, as any unbiased history ought to attempt, but this account seemed almost too 'fair', watering down the evil that Chivington and other men with him did, while on the surface telling enough bare facts about the massacre to appear fair and unbiased. I suspect that a truly honest account of the Sand Creek Massacre and Chivongton's motivations might be a bit uglier a story, and might not fit into such a short book, and certainly a more complete account might be too disturbing for some audiences. This book is a decent start for anyone wishing to know about this massacre and the environment within which it occured, but it is best used as a brief overview followed up by reading other sources and accounts. ( )
  JBarringer | Dec 30, 2017 |
A rather dry reading of an important event in American history. Tis really easy to have a dislike for America"s military involvement w/ the Indians... ( )
  untraveller | Sep 7, 2016 |
Showing 3 of 3
no reviews | add a review
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
People/Characters
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Epigraph
Dedication
To a literary saddlemate, Brent Ashabranner
First words
Daybreak of November 29, 1864, swelled over the land's edge in southeastern Colorado Territory and moved westward across the mesquite-spotted sand hills, revealing the village of Black Kettle's Cheyennes nestled in a bend of the dry-bedded Sand Creek.
Quotations
Last words
(Click to show. Warning: May contain spoilers.)
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Blurbers
Original language
Canonical DDC/MDS
Canonical LCC

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English (2)

Sometimes called "The Chivington Massacre" by those who would emphasize his responsibility for the attack and "The Battle of Sand Creek" by those who would imply that it was not a massacre, this event has become one of our nations most controversial Indian conflicts. The subject of army and Congressional investigations and inquiries, a matter of vigorous newspaper debates, the object of much oratory and writing biased in both directions, the Sand Creek Massacre very likely will never be completely and satisfactorily resolved. This account of the massacre investigates the historical events leading to the battle, tracing the growth of the Indian-white conflict in Colorado Territory. The author has shown the way in which the discontent stemming from the treaty of Fort Wise, the depredations committed by the Cheyennes and Arapahoes prior to the massacre, and the desire of some of the commanding officers for a bloody victory against the Indians laid the groundwork for the battle at Sand Creek.

No library descriptions found.

Book description
Haiku summary

Current Discussions

None

Popular covers

Quick Links

Rating

Average: (3.6)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3 5
3.5 1
4 2
4.5 1
5 1

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 202,658,004 books! | Top bar: Always visible