Craig's work still stands as one of the most important studies extant on German militarism. Written during the first two decades after the end of World War II, The Politics of the Prussian Army, also gives burgeoning historians insight into the state of historiography dealing with Germany during this period. It is comprehensive, institutionally oriented, and far afield from the current generation's emphasis on class, sex, and race. Rather, Craig describes not only the Prussianization of the German army but the Prussianization of the German nation. At the same time, he also traces the rise of the Prussian/German military as an independent political force, subject to nobody--not even the kaiser during World War I. I don't know if this work is still taught in undergraduate studies or graduate seminars. It should be. ( )

Great book! Discusses the interplay between the Prussian Army, the Crown and the population. From 1640 on the army was a separate entity in Prussia, later Imerial Germany. Loyal only to the Crown, and standing in the way of any liberal change in the nation. The book also focuses on how the army influenced internal and foreign policy in general. Without giving away too much....the army continued in this manner until the arrival on the scene of Adolph Hitler. Apparently AH was the only one to figure out how to curb and then donimate the German Army. All this resulted in disaster for Reich.

The only reason I did not give the book 5 Stars is that Gordon Craig is one of those authors that thinks EVERYONE speaks and reads German and French. His book is laced with phrases in primarily German, but also French. He gives no translations. I find this extremely frustrating. This style really takes away from my experience reading a book. How much do I miss by not reading German/French? I don't know. I am one of those readers who actually reads footnotes. When they are in German/French, I am out. ( )

This book was the foundation of a class I took on German Operational Art and Military tradition. Unlike the other books in the course (and most of the others that I have read), this book focuses of the political process and the interplay between the King, the Government and the Military rather than purely military matters. My professor wrote: Craig is a master historian, and his version of Prussian history has become the standard in the field. No sound study of Prussia can be made without Gordon Craig’s incisive analysis and commentary. Nevertheless, Craig’s style is not without fault. He often marginalizes people, choosing instead to write that ideas and events often shaped the personalities, rather than the personalities shaping the events. This is particularly true when Craig seeks to show that the Prussian Army was continually the obstacle to social and political reform. Indeed, Craig sees Prussian history as a continuous constitutional struggle between those seeking an English constitutional monarchy with those wanting absolutism. But Prussia was an alliance between king and nobility; liberalism was not fashionable even to the middle class, given the neighbors of Prussia. All of which is absolutely true, and yet, he managed to make the political process, often a tedious thing to me, interesting and engaging. You feel like, during the course of the book, that if you could reach in and fix a few things, history might have turned out very differently. ( )