HomeGroupsTalkMoreZeitgeist
Search Site
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Loading...

The new astronomy

by S. P. Langley

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingConversations
4None3,410,100NoneNone
Purchase of this book includes free trial access to www.million-books.com where you can read more than a million books for free. This is an OCR edition with typos. Excerpt from book: TIT. THE SUN'S ENERGY. TT is indeed, says good Bishop Berkeley, an opinion J- strangely prevailing amongst men that . . . all sensible objects have an existence . . . distinct from their being perceived by the understanding. But . . . some truths there are, so near and obvious to the mind, that a man need only open his eyes to see them. Such I take this important one to be, namely, that all the choir of heaven and furniture of the earth ? in a word, all those bodies which compose the mighty frame of the world ? have not any subsistence without a mind. We are not going to take the reader along the high priori road of metaphysics, but only to speak of certain accepted conclusions of modern experimental physics, which do not themselves, indeed, justify all of Berkeley's language, but to which these words of the author of A New Theory of Vision seem to be a not unfit prelude. When we see a rose-leaf, we see with it what we call a color, and we are apt to think it is in the rose. But the color is in us, for it is a sensation which something coming from the sun excites in the eye; so that if the rose-leaf were still there, there would be no color unless there were an eye to receive and a brain to interpret the sensation. Every color that is lovely in the rainbow or the flower, every hue that is vivid in a ribbon or sombre in the grave harmonies of some old Persian rug, the metallic lustre of the humming-bird or the sober imperial yellowof precious china, ? all these have no existence as color apart from the seeing eye, and all have their fount and origin in the sun itself. Color and light, then, are not, properly speaking, external things, but names given to the sensations caused by an uncomprehended something radiated from the sun, when this falls on o...… (more)
None
Loading...

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

No reviews
no reviews | add a review
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
People/Characters
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Epigraph
Dedication
First words
Quotations
Last words
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Blurbers
Original language
Canonical DDC/MDS
Canonical LCC

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English

None

Purchase of this book includes free trial access to www.million-books.com where you can read more than a million books for free. This is an OCR edition with typos. Excerpt from book: TIT. THE SUN'S ENERGY. TT is indeed, says good Bishop Berkeley, an opinion J- strangely prevailing amongst men that . . . all sensible objects have an existence . . . distinct from their being perceived by the understanding. But . . . some truths there are, so near and obvious to the mind, that a man need only open his eyes to see them. Such I take this important one to be, namely, that all the choir of heaven and furniture of the earth ? in a word, all those bodies which compose the mighty frame of the world ? have not any subsistence without a mind. We are not going to take the reader along the high priori road of metaphysics, but only to speak of certain accepted conclusions of modern experimental physics, which do not themselves, indeed, justify all of Berkeley's language, but to which these words of the author of A New Theory of Vision seem to be a not unfit prelude. When we see a rose-leaf, we see with it what we call a color, and we are apt to think it is in the rose. But the color is in us, for it is a sensation which something coming from the sun excites in the eye; so that if the rose-leaf were still there, there would be no color unless there were an eye to receive and a brain to interpret the sensation. Every color that is lovely in the rainbow or the flower, every hue that is vivid in a ribbon or sombre in the grave harmonies of some old Persian rug, the metallic lustre of the humming-bird or the sober imperial yellowof precious china, ? all these have no existence as color apart from the seeing eye, and all have their fount and origin in the sun itself. Color and light, then, are not, properly speaking, external things, but names given to the sensations caused by an uncomprehended something radiated from the sun, when this falls on o...

No library descriptions found.

Book description
Haiku summary

Current Discussions

None

Popular covers

Quick Links

Rating

Average: No ratings.

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 203,186,483 books! | Top bar: Always visible