HomeGroupsTalkMoreZeitgeist
Search Site
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Loading...

The Reliability of the New Testament: Bart Ehrman and Daniel Wallace in Dialogue

by Robert B. Stewart, Daniel B. Wallace

Other authors: Craig A. Evans (Contributor), K. Martin Heide (Contributor), Michael W. Holmes (Contributor), Dale B. Martin (Contributor), David Parker (Contributor)2 more, Sylvie T. Raquel (Contributor), William Warren (Contributor)

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingConversations
63None419,866NoneNone
"This volume highlights points of agreement and disagreement between two leading scholars on the subject of the textual reliability of the New Testament: Bart Ehrman, James A. Gray Distinguished Professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and author of the best-selling book Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, and Daniel Wallace, Professor of New Testament Studies at Dallas Theological Seminary and Executive Director of the Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts.This conversation between Ehrman and Wallace allows the reader to see in print how each presents his position in light of the other's. Contributions follow from an interdisciplinary team featuring specialists in biblical studies, philosophy, and theology. The textual reliability of the New Testament is logically prior to its interpretation and thus important for the Christian religion. This book provides interested readers a fair and balanced case for both sides and allows them to decide for themselves: What does it mean for a text to be textually reliable? How reliable is the New Testament? How reliable is reliable enough?" -- Publisher description.… (more)
None
Loading...

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

No reviews
Although this book has many highlights, no single element offers a trump card to settle the issue. In the absence of conclusions, readers are left to come to their own.
added by Christa_Josh | editJournal of the Evangelical Theological Society, D. Brent Sandy (Jun 1, 2012)
 

» Add other authors

Author nameRoleType of authorWork?Status
Robert B. Stewartprimary authorall editionscalculated
Wallace, Daniel B.main authorall editionsconfirmed
Evans, Craig A.Contributorsecondary authorall editionsconfirmed
Heide, K. MartinContributorsecondary authorall editionsconfirmed
Holmes, Michael W.Contributorsecondary authorall editionsconfirmed
Martin, Dale B.Contributorsecondary authorall editionsconfirmed
Parker, DavidContributorsecondary authorall editionsconfirmed
Raquel, Sylvie T.Contributorsecondary authorall editionsconfirmed
Warren, WilliamContributorsecondary authorall editionsconfirmed
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
People/Characters
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Epigraph
Dedication
First words
Quotations
Last words
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Blurbers
Original language
Canonical DDC/MDS
Canonical LCC

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English (3)

"This volume highlights points of agreement and disagreement between two leading scholars on the subject of the textual reliability of the New Testament: Bart Ehrman, James A. Gray Distinguished Professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and author of the best-selling book Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why, and Daniel Wallace, Professor of New Testament Studies at Dallas Theological Seminary and Executive Director of the Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts.This conversation between Ehrman and Wallace allows the reader to see in print how each presents his position in light of the other's. Contributions follow from an interdisciplinary team featuring specialists in biblical studies, philosophy, and theology. The textual reliability of the New Testament is logically prior to its interpretation and thus important for the Christian religion. This book provides interested readers a fair and balanced case for both sides and allows them to decide for themselves: What does it mean for a text to be textually reliable? How reliable is the New Testament? How reliable is reliable enough?" -- Publisher description.

No library descriptions found.

Book description
Haiku summary

Current Discussions

None

Popular covers

Quick Links

Rating

Average: No ratings.

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 206,079,759 books! | Top bar: Always visible