HomeGroupsTalkMoreZeitgeist
Search Site
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Writing Popular Fiction by Dean R. Koontz
Loading...

Writing Popular Fiction (edition 1974)

by Dean R. Koontz

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingConversations
1222227,133 (3.54)None
Member:JohanBothaSkrywer
Title:Writing Popular Fiction
Authors:Dean R. Koontz
Info:Writers Digest Books (1974), Hardcover
Collections:Your library
Rating:
Tags:None

Work Information

Writing Popular Fiction by Dean Koontz

None
Loading...

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

Showing 2 of 2
Given the age of the book, this has dated itself in a number of interesting ways. But not all of it! His title generating exercise, for example, remains quite relevant. ( )
  Jon_Hansen | Jan 9, 2024 |
I think if I had read this closer to the publication date, say 1980, then I would have given it 4 stars, but as it was, this book is incredibly dated. It might hold a few good points for basic craft, but the information and advice given here is no longer on the pulse point of genre fiction, which has changed drastically since this book was first published. Likewise, the information given for seeking an agent etc. may be generally ok as a very rough guide for people who want to go down the traditional publication route, however it is severely dated, e.g. typing your manuscript on carbon paper to ensure you keep a copy while you wrap the original in brown paper and twine to send to a publisher and hope the postal worker does not step on it.

I had hoped this would give more information to do with craft and how Dean Koontz has managed to be so successful over the years, however I was disappointed as it seemed bogged down with lengthy descriptions of each genre type and affectations of, as they existed in the 1970s. So it's not a bad book, just no longer relevant in my opinion. I wanted to stop reading it after the first 30 pages or so, but forced myself to read on just in case there were a few gems. Unfortunately I didn't find any for my purposes, but that's not to say other's won't.

Read if you are nostalgic or want to learn about the history of how to get published. ( )
  KatiaMDavis | Dec 19, 2017 |
Showing 2 of 2
no reviews | add a review
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
People/Characters
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Epigraph
Dedication
First words
Quotations
Last words
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Blurbers
Original language
Canonical DDC/MDS
Canonical LCC

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English

None

No library descriptions found.

Book description
Haiku summary

Current Discussions

None

Popular covers

Quick Links

Rating

Average: (3.54)
0.5
1
1.5
2 2
2.5 1
3 1
3.5
4 7
4.5
5 1

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 207,172,353 books! | Top bar: Always visible