Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
Loading... Apollonius of Tyana, the philosopher-reformer of the first century, A.D (edition 1901)by G. R. S. Mead
Work InformationApollonius of Tyana by G. R. S. Mead
None Loading...
Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. No current Talk conversations about this book. no reviews | add a review
Subtitle: A Critical Study of the Only Existing Record of His Life, With Some Account of the War of Opinion Concerning Him, and an Introduction on the Religious Associations and Brotherhoods of the Times and the Possible Influence of Indian Thought on Greece ... Publisher: Theosophical pub. society Publication date: 1901 Subjects: Biography No library descriptions found. |
Current DiscussionsNonePopular covers
Google Books — Loading... GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)180Philosophy and Psychology Ancient, medieval and eastern philosophy Ancient PhilosophersLC ClassificationRatingAverage:
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |
It's a neat old book on Apollonius of Tyana, a religio-philosopher of the first century A.D. in the Roman Empire by theosophist and scholar G. R. S. Mead. The book kind of tells you a bit more about Mead and Blatavaskian Theosophy than it does Apollonius of Tyana. Mead takes great pains to make Apollonius look not like a first century miracle-worker à la Jesus but like a Indian sage à la Theosophy. He thus poo poos all reference to Apollonius as a magic man and makes him a guru of the Hindu/Buddhist type. His supposed travels to India are made much of; Pythagoras and Egypt, much less important. Mead denounces the historical sources for Apollonius: Philostratus through Damis. Instead, he claims to glean what is good from the sources and discards the dross. Everything he keeps makes Apollonius like a Theosophist guru instead of a Roman philosopher who supposedly worked wonders. Mead says several times that with proper work and practice (it is implied that the proper way is Theosophical) anybody could be like Apollonius and do the things he did.
The work is done in a late-1800s/early 1900s antiquarian style, with lots of odd footnotes, obscure references, etc. It bounces back and forth in time, and is not really done in a narrative or chronological manner. It is not the best source on Apollonius, but it is an interesting read and informative. If you know nothing of Apollonius, it is a decent place to start if you can get it cheap. If you like Theosophy, it will be a great addition to your bookshelf. ( )