Picture of author.

James Burnham (1905–1987)

Author of The Machiavellians: Defenders of Freedom

15+ Works 691 Members 8 Reviews 4 Favorited

About the Author

James Burnham (1905-1987) began his career as a professor of philosophy at New York University. He co-founded, with William F. Buckley. Jr., The National Review Michael Henry received his advanced degree in political theory. He has been teaching philosophy at St. John's University in New York since show more 1977 show less

Includes the name: James Burnham

Image credit: Marxists.org

Works by James Burnham

Associated Works

The Stars at War (1986) — Contributor — 192 copies
On the Firing Line: The Public Life of Our Public Figures (1989) — Contributor — 112 copies
Keeping the Tablets: Modern American Conservative Thought (1988) — Contributor — 59 copies
Modern Age: The First Twenty-Five Years (1810) — Contributor — 53 copies

Tagged

Common Knowledge

Members

Reviews

This is an excellent book, overall. If you are a political scientist, then this must be on your shelf, and you must read it. He followed a path of strict realism when writing this book and, some may even say, he imbued the text with a small degree of cynicism. There is no woolly-headed philosophy in the book: just political science as he sees it.

I was not always clear about his definition of a manager. Does he refer to corporate managers or bureaucrats, or does he refer to the core team around political leaders? This is not always clear.… (more)
 
Flagged
RajivC | Feb 4, 2022 |
This is still incredibly relevant, maybe even more so today - if it was written now, the author would be hounded for it.
 
Flagged
Paul_S | 3 other reviews | Dec 30, 2021 |
Ένα εξαιρετικά επικίνδυνο βιβλίο. Η προσέγγιση των ιδεών που πραγματεύεται απαιτεί από τον αναγνώστη μεγάλη προσοχή και κριτική σκέψη. Κατά τη γνώμη μου δεν θα πρέπει να είναι ένα από τα πρώτα βιβλία πολιτικής φιλοσοφίας που αποφασίζει να διαβάσει κάποιος.
 
Flagged
Stamat | 1 other review | Apr 20, 2021 |
A classic work that is illuminating at least as much for its analysis of modern ideology as for its thesis (which has become relevant again in the face of the rise of militant Islam).

The main flaw in this work is the 39 point litmus test for liberalism; people reflexively take it as a measure of where one falls on a left-right spectrum and so misunderstand it. The list is best understood as a list of principles that are so central to liberalism that their negation would question one's status as a bona fide liberal; a measure of conservatism would require a different list.… (more)
 
Flagged
Eagleduck86 | 3 other reviews | Aug 22, 2011 |

Awards

You May Also Like

Associated Authors

Statistics

Works
15
Also by
6
Members
691
Popularity
#36,611
Rating
3.9
Reviews
8
ISBNs
43
Languages
3
Favorited
4

Charts & Graphs