Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
Loading... Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campusesby Richard Arum, Josipa Roksa
None Loading...
Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. No current Talk conversations about this book. Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses is a detailed collection of statistics and cross references to additional research compiled by the authors. While the book contains 259 pages, the relevant information it presents is limited to the first 144 pages. The remainder is devoted to the bibliography and validation of the authors’ statistical analysis. The book can be summarized by three basic themes: Education is not equally available or of the same quality across socioeconomic lines. Students don’t want to study and want the easiest path to a degree. Educators promote this behavior because they don’t hold students to standards. The book offers that students today have high aspirations but simply no plans for reaching those goals. They are “adrift” not only academically but in their lives. They have no drive and expect a degree to be handed to them. Some of the statistics presented as backup were a bit startling. The average college student sends only 27 hours per week on all academic activities; going to class, studying and working on assignments. This is less time spent on academics than the typical high school student. However, this lack of effort isn’t reflected in their assessments as there has been little change in the average GPA of college students or graduation rates over the decades. Universities are simply handing out degrees to students that haven’t earned them. Both students and faculty are to blame. A number of student interviews are quoted in the book and show that students want to put in as little effort in their studies as possible and spend more time socializing and having fun. There is little incentive on the students’ part to work hard because educators don’t push them to perform. Some “ivy league” schools are noted as inflating grades so that the average GPA of their student population stays higher than average. This does a disservice to their students and could lead to a depreciation of the very brand image they are attempting to bolster. The majority of the book details the dire situation in which we find the educational system today. The last chapter does offer a few solutions. These include: better preparing students for academics prior to reaching college, pulling back on the notion that every student needs to go to college because some simply won’t be able to keep pace, holding higher education faculty to higher standards and improving curriculums to include more reading and writing which was shown to increase critical thinking skills. Great book to stir up questions, but the lack of a clear section on limitations and drawing graduation implications from a study of first and second year students is reason for some caution. With clearly stated limitations and well-grounded implications it would have received at least four stars and maybe five. This is a must read for any teacher -- or anyone who wants to comment on the state of education. Fixing our schools has absolutely nothing to do with privatizing them. (In fact, private schools oftentimes remove standards because they need customers who don't like doing the heavy lifting). Instead, we need to bring back rigor and standards to our classroom, demanding students put in the time and the work so they may think better!
Though ponderously stated (as is the whole book), the message again is that the university must be policed and regulated through outcomes testing.
Education.
Nonfiction.
HTML: In spite of soaring tuition costs, more and more students go to college every year. A bachelor's degree is now required for entry into a growing number of professions. And some parents begin planning for the expense of sending their kids to college when they're born. Almost everyone strives to go, but almost no one asks the fundamental question posed by Academically Adrift: are undergraduates really learning anything once they get there? For a large proportion of students, Richard Arum and Josipa Roksa's answer to that question is a definitive no. Their extensive research draws on survey responses, transcript data, and, for the first time, the state-of-the-art Collegiate Learning Assessment, a standardized test administered to students in their first semester and then again at the end of their second year. According to their analysis of more than 2,300 undergraduates at twenty-four institutions, 45 percent of these students demonstrate no significant improvement in a range of skillsâ??including critical thinking, complex reasoning, and writingâ??during their first two years of college. As troubling as their findings are, Arum and Roksa argue that for many faculty and administrators they will come as no surpriseâ??instead, they are the expected result of a student body distracted by socializing or working and an institutional culture that puts undergraduate learning close to the bottom of the priority list. Academically Adrift holds sobering lessons for students, faculty, administrators, policy makers, and parentsâ??all of whom are implicated in promoting or at least ignoring contemporary campus culture. Higher education faces crises on a number of fronts, but Arum and Roksa's report that colleges are failing at their most basic mission will demand the attention of No library descriptions found. |
Current DiscussionsNonePopular covers
Google Books — Loading... GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)378.198Social sciences Education Higher education Organization and management; curriculumsLC ClassificationRatingAverage:
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |
I had assigned a visual self portrait, with a brief explanatory essay applying concepts from class. Most students elected to created photo collages. They identify the most important things in their lives to be their friends, their families, and their faith. Next were movies and video games they enjoy, and pets. When they wrote about or included images related to their university experience, it was about college friendships and parties, sorority life, or sports. None mentioned their major, and very few mentioned career goals or plans for the future, except for the desire to have a family. ( )