This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.
Hide this

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Kill Shakespeare, Volume 2: The Blast of War…

Kill Shakespeare, Volume 2: The Blast of War

by Conor McCreery

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingMentions
715168,809 (3.32)4



Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

» See also 4 mentions

Showing 5 of 5
I think the authors of this may have invented a new genre, but I'm not sure what to call it. It's the opposite of fan fiction - SpiteFic maybe?

This reads as though somebody who had a brief flirtation with Shakespeare had then been asked to write a comic in his style; the result is full of thous and thees and perchances, mostly used incorrectly, and is horribly off kilter and full of soap opera-like interactions.

Of course I read the first volume imagining that the authors were fans of the Bard, but it makes much more sense now that I realize that they are taking the proverbial, as we say in London. ( )
  MartynChuzz | Feb 22, 2016 |
In this second volume we get the massive clash between the forces of Juliet and Richard III. At the same time, Hamlet goes to the Globe in search of Shakespeare but meeting one's creator isn't everything it's cracked up to be.

An excellent second volume. While I wasn't expecting the story arc to wrapped up so neatly in two volumes, there continues to be excellent plotting, references and allusions, and characters cropping up that you would never expect. I also love that the artists went for the more pirate-y look for Shakespeare as he definitely fits in best with the world created in the series. ( )
  MickyFine | Feb 22, 2015 |
this one was a disappointment. i was very pleased with the first one, particularly since i'm always interested in metafictional universi, but this sequel seemed oddly desultory and unstructured, so i won't go looking for more. ( )
  macha | May 31, 2014 |
I reviewed the first volume of Kill Shakespeare in December 2010. This review may contain minor spoilers for that book.

Hamlet has cast his lot with the Prodigals who rebel against the tyranny of King Richard III. With Juliet, Othello, Falstaff and other Shakespearean heroes, he journeys to the Globe Woods to find the god of their world, William Shakespeare himself. However, there's a traitor in the company's midst, sent by the manipulative Lady Macbeth; she has allied herself with King Richard but plans to steal all power for herself when the final battle between Prodigals and the royal armies has been won. Can her magic and Richard's military tactics be overthrown by a tiny band of rebels? Not bloody likely, especially since their savior Shakespeare is a bit too deep into his cups to be of use to anyone...

I found the conclusion to Kill Shakespeare unsatisfying, and I can't quite put my finger on why.

Perhaps it's the change to Hamlet's personality? In his play, Hamlet is a mopey dopey prince who waffles and flip-flops his way to a tragic end. Not here. Hamlet is recast as a hero, freed at last from the ghost of his father and his crippling indecision. The problem is, he isn't Hamlet anymore, but someone infinitely less interesting. He may save the kingdom and get the girl, but now he's just another typical fantasy-story hero. Juliet is similarly effected; like Hamlet, her tragic past is largely eradicated, and she is greatly reduced in the process.

Maybe it's the appearance of William Shakespeare as the literal deus ex machina. I don't want to spoil the ending, so I won't describe it, but I found it completely disappointing. His presence makes the story entirely too self-aware. It does raise an interesting question, though: do characters act as they do because they choose to or because they must – that is, they were written that way? Richard chooses the latter, angrily accusing Shakespeare that if he is evil, it is because he was made to be so. But then again, there are characters like Hamlet and Juliet, who defy the roles given them in the plays.

Can something be simultaneously rushed and dragged out? That's how I felt about this second volume of Kill Shakespeare. The story is left wide open to continue, as one of the villains escapes and lives to threaten the heroes another day, but most of the major plots are tied together rather neatly. As far as I know, the story has not yet been continued into a third volume, but the official website implies that more adventures are forthcoming... ( )
1 vote makaiju | Jan 10, 2013 |
Showing 5 of 5
no reviews | add a review
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Series (with order)
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Awards and honors
First words
Last words
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Publisher series
Original language

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English (1)

Book description
Haiku summary

No descriptions found.

Hamlet has decided to join Juliet, Othello, Iago, and Falstaff in their rebellion.

» see all 2 descriptions

Quick Links

Popular covers


Average: (3.32)
1 1
3 9
3.5 2
4 7

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.


About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 125,728,486 books! | Top bar: Always visible