Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
Loading... The Tree of Gnosis: Gnostic Mythology from Early Christianity to Modern Nihilismby Ioan P. Couliano
Loading...
Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. No current Talk conversations about this book. no reviews | add a review
No library descriptions found.
|
Current DiscussionsNonePopular covers
Google Books — Loading... GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)299.932Religions Other Religions By Region/Civilization Other Syncretic religions and religions of modern origin GnosticismLC ClassificationRatingAverage:
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |
The "tree" of the title is not a genealogical tree, but rather a logical one tout court, as Couliano takes Gnosticism (or more generally, dualist theology) to be an "ideal object" existing "in a logical dimension." Its variegation orients to three principal axes: ecosystemic intelligence (i.e. "the god of this world"), the anthropic principle, and the "superiority of humankind to the world and its creators." Couliano disagrees vigorously with those who rate the antique Gnostics as pessimists, insisting very adroitly that their metaphysics provides for extreme optimism in the context of a negative valuation of the existing cosmos.
The bulky middle of the text, treating the specifics of different dualist thinkers and sects in late antiquity, is good coverage. But the juicy parts are the methodological introduction and the chapters at the end that include the comparison of traditional "metaphysical" gnoses to their modern "anti-metaphysical" counterparts, and a ludic paradigm of doctrinal development.
It's a shame that Couliano was too early to comment on the millennial glut of Gnostic cinema (The Matrix, Dark City, The Truman Show, etc.). He also dismisses the Gnostic character of Philip K. Dick's work on the basis of a reading of The Divine Invasion, when he would have been better off looking at VALIS, The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch, or even Dick's self-analytical Exegesis.
This 1990 book (in the French original) is a relatively recent one in its field, distinctly following and often criticizing the first wave of scholarship driven by the epochal Nag Hammadi finds of the mid-20th century. While it was not as revelatory for me as Couliano's earlier Eros and Magic in the Renaissance, it is still an outstanding study that deserves the attention of anyone interested in its subject matter.