May use this book in WMST 490 next year, as centerpiece for seminar topic. ( )

If you're a pro-choice feminist or just pro-reporoductive rights, this book will anger you beyond belief before you get to page 20. I'm trying to decide if I should keep reading. (Ed. note. I skimmed through the rest of the book and became even more outraged yet inspired. I think those women who are pro-life will also find the book upsetting because of the way patriarchal based governments and religions manipulate the ideas of women's fertility for their own ambitions.) ( )

This book covers reproductive rights throughout the world and covers very, very complicated issues related to it: the problems of population growth/decline, how women and their sexuality are viewed in different societies, education, and women as financial burdens (in India, girls are not as desirable because their parents must pay increasingly expensive dowries to the groom's family when their daughters marry). It was interesting to see how all of these different issues affected ideas about reproduction. I thought the first half of the book moved along pretty well, but the rest of it seemed disorganized and was harder for me to get through. ( )

This is a very informative and well-written book. The author looks at the spread of contraception and abortion worldwide as well as a number of issues related to birth control. Although the countries examined include India, Bangladesh, Nicaragua, and Sierra Leone, the initial push for population control came from the U.S and the West. Goldberg interviewed many people and has stories from top policymakers, grassroots local activists and ordinary women affected by changing policies and social conditions. She presents a nuanced view of the issues covered. Highly recommended.

If there was one criticism about this book, it was that it jumped around a bit. The opening chapter discusses the abortion ban in Nicaragua, the history that led up to the ban and views from both sides of the debate. Then the author moves into the background of the family planning/population control movement worldwide. For the most part, this is the overarching narrative but Goldberg takes side detours to look at female circumcision, India’s skewed birth ratios, the European birth decline and the AIDs epidemic. However, pretty much everything is interesting and well-researched so I didn’t mind.

The initial push for population control was framed as a national security issue – visions of hordes of angry, poor, non-white people becoming Communists. In the early days, there was broad popular and political support for the initiative. As will be seen throughout the book – resistance arises from the left and the right. Goldberg discusses a number of influential people – the man who developed an easy to use abortion device, Margaret Sanger, John D. Rockefeller III, Reimert Ravenholt – a scientist who eventually gained a political position and aggressively pushed birth control. The flaws in both arguments and approaches are covered – Goldberg notes that Sanger made some racist-sounding arguments to appeal to the right and Ravenholt was a polarizing figure, both for his sometimes sexist behavior and his ignorance to real-world conditions of the women he was trying to help. While many problems in this initial push are noted, Goldberg catches the giddy excitement of the people in it who truly believed they were helping to change the world and had an inventive anything-goes mentality. A movement gradually springs up where women’s rights come to the forefront. This argument is developed through the whole book – when women have more rights and are more valued, they tend to have smaller families and the overall welfare of daughters goes up.

This way of thinking finally becomes enshrined in some of the UN goal statements. Goldberg charts the opposition on both the left and the right. The Catholic Church is a prominent critic of birth control and abortion as might be expected but in the early days, a conference was convened that came out pro-birth control. This position was ignored in the Church hierarchy and that has continued. Arguments on the left focus on the idea that population control is another form of imperialism. Some of these arguments influenced the movement – the feminist ideas of pushing for equality along with providing birth control came out of criticism of the one-size-fits-all, population goals, ends-justifies-means initial mentality.

The author is clearly critical of US administrations that put religious beliefs and conservative ideas of women as only wives and mothers above the realities seen on the ground. She provides evidence of how some of these policies were harmful and unrealistic. I suppose some might complain that she takes cheap shots by describing how the Catholic Church allied with Iran to oppose UN actions or how she describes some of the speakers at their planned pro-family anti-birth control conferences – one who was pretty anti-Semitic, one who supported beating one’s wife (Goldberg notes with a straight face that his apologists said he only suggested doing it as a last resort and not too hard) but I felt that the author had shown the flaws in a number of people on both sides of the argument and she spends more time showing the false basis of this side’s beliefs. While the UN directives don’t affect the lives of Americans, some in other countries have directly appealed to the UN and won their cases. Since the US is the largest donor country, administrations there can have an outsize effect as is clearly shown – America is almost bipolar on the issue, depending which group is in power.

The chapters on issues were also very fascinating and again showed the effects of both local movements and worldwide policies. Goldberg emphasizes that a one size fits all approach like Ravenholt promoted isn’t effective but that Western money, organization and initiatives are important in supporting the local movements. I was familiar with some of the issues she mentions – female circumcision and European declining birth rates – but I did learn a good deal in the chapters.

She discusses beliefs on both sides of the female circumcision movement which I’d heard before but also the development and spread of female circumcision as well as initial European reactions. The author interviewed a woman who had been cut herself and she described the initiation ceremony. Goldberg comes out with a moderate message – shouldn’t be done to children, but if women choose it for themselves, it should be accepted. However, as she notes, there are cultural pressures even for adults. I had read about some of the reasons for the birth decline in Europe as well as the contrast between the French/Scandinavian systems and the Spanish/Italian systems with America as an outlier. The author goes into more detail on the oddities of the American system – she mentions the high teenage birth rate and cheap childcare as reasons for the higher birth rate as well as the instability or flexibility of the job market. She also covers the situation in Germany – I would have thought that would be similar to France/Scandinavia but cultural and policy reasons have it closer to Spain/Italy/Poland. Goldberg occasionally suggests solutions but even she seems to find the Indian sex selection problem intractable. She again provides a detailed, nuanced look at the situation. ( )

A thoroughly researched and highly informative look at the subjects of contraception, abortion, and women's reproductive rights on the global stage, and most particularly in the developing world. These issues, it turns out, are much more complex than the basic fundamentalists vs. liberals narrative that those of us here in the US tend to buy into, involving all kinds of tangled religious, cultural and political factors. Michelle Goldberg navigates us through all of them, and while her own emphatically pro-choice stance on the matter is clear, she never descends to the level of a political shouting match, instead keeping her prose calm and measured even when discussing things that I personally would have trouble not getting ranty about. In the end, she makes a very cogent and persuasive argument that, despite all obstacles, increasing freedoms for women is very much a win-win approach, rather than a choice between individual rights and the greater social good. ( )