Rick Edwards (1) (1979–)
Author of Science(ish): the Peculiar Science Behind the Movies
For other authors named Rick Edwards, see the disambiguation page.
Works by Rick Edwards
Tagged
Common Knowledge
- Legal name
- Edwards, Richard Phillip
- Birthdate
- 1979-05-20
- Gender
- male
- Education
- University of Cambridge (1st Tripos Mathematics, 2nd Tripos Natural Sciences)
- Occupations
- TV presenter
podcaster
screenwriter - Nationality
- UK
- Birthplace
- Enfield, London, England, UK
- Places of residence
- North London, England, UK
Portsmouth, Hampshire, England, UK - Associated Place (for map)
- England, UK
Members
Reviews
A fairly run-of-the-mill pop-science book. Science(ish), commissioned off the back of a successful podcast, takes ten sci-fi movies and goes into the scientific plausibility behind them. As a history buff who enjoys comparable discussions regarding historical accuracy in movies, I was looking forward to Science(ish), particularly as I had seen nine of the ten movies being discussed (Gattaca being the exception).
However, the discussion of the movies themselves is rather limited; each title show more being only a jumping-off point for a wider scientific discussion. This was disappointing, but would've been fine if the science had been particularly engaging or original. Unfortunately, it isn't; it's mostly Science 101 and not delivered with any especial flair or erudition. (That said, reading the book in 2020, the discussion of a possible global viral pandemic in the 28 Days Later chapter was curious, to say the least.) There's also some hackneyed banter between the two authors in between the scientific passages (most likely a carry-over from their podcast), which only reinforces the contrived nature of the book. Though not bad, Science(ish) is only competent and there are much better examples of agreeable pop-science out there. show less
However, the discussion of the movies themselves is rather limited; each title show more being only a jumping-off point for a wider scientific discussion. This was disappointing, but would've been fine if the science had been particularly engaging or original. Unfortunately, it isn't; it's mostly Science 101 and not delivered with any especial flair or erudition. (That said, reading the book in 2020, the discussion of a possible global viral pandemic in the 28 Days Later chapter was curious, to say the least.) There's also some hackneyed banter between the two authors in between the scientific passages (most likely a carry-over from their podcast), which only reinforces the contrived nature of the book. Though not bad, Science(ish) is only competent and there are much better examples of agreeable pop-science out there. show less
A fun read, and a splendid concept because we all ponder these sorts of things as we walk out of the movie theater.
https://fromtheheartofeurope.eu/scienceish-the-peculiar-science-behind-the-movie...
This is a popular science book, aimed perhaps at the older end of the teenage market. It takes ten well-known films – The Martian, Jurassic Park, Interstellar, Planet of the Apes, Back to the Future, 28 Days Later, The Matrix, Gattaca, Ex Machina and Alien – and hangs a series of short reflections off them about the state of play in real science of the concepts developed in each film. It is breezily show more presented as a dialogue between the two podcast hosts. I found the sidebar sections a little annoying, and would have preferred them to be integrated into the main text, but otherwise it is harmless enough. Of the films I have not seen, Gattaca sounds the most interesting. show less
This is a popular science book, aimed perhaps at the older end of the teenage market. It takes ten well-known films – The Martian, Jurassic Park, Interstellar, Planet of the Apes, Back to the Future, 28 Days Later, The Matrix, Gattaca, Ex Machina and Alien – and hangs a series of short reflections off them about the state of play in real science of the concepts developed in each film. It is breezily show more presented as a dialogue between the two podcast hosts. I found the sidebar sections a little annoying, and would have preferred them to be integrated into the main text, but otherwise it is harmless enough. Of the films I have not seen, Gattaca sounds the most interesting. show less
Awards
You May Also Like
Associated Authors
Statistics
- Works
- 3
- Members
- 122
- Popularity
- #163,288
- Rating
- 3.5
- Reviews
- 3
- ISBNs
- 16


