Simon Yates (1) (1963–)

This book is less expedidtion detailed then many I've read. Most of the "adventure" books I've read have generally focused on a particular expedition or of an author's experiences on a particular mountain over the course of several seasons. There seemed to be to be a lot less of technical information on routes/gear/techniques then in most books I've read. This may be a plus for non-climbers. Simon seems almost to be giving a travelogue of his life and trying to explain to the reader the show more aspects of adventure that appeal to him. For the non-climber, or the potential reader who feels that they are less adventuresome I would recommend reading the epilogue first. show less

Two unusual characters: Jess, a petite wanna-be movie producer, and and Tanner, a huge ex-con with a grudge (his wrongful conviction), with opposing goals. It's fast paced and well-written, but with a few things that bugged me. (YMMV.)

Disclaimer: I received a free copy of this novel in exchange for an honest review. Additionally, I'm a big fan of Dee J. Adams and her awesome writing.

Sometimes, size matters. Jess is a "tiny little thing," it mentions in more than one place she's about a show more hundred pounds, which would put her at about five feet tall, MAYBE 5'2". Tanner is 6'4" and strongly built.

I'm 5'9", and I've dated men who are 6'4"; the kinds of accommodations that Jess and Tanner make in AGAINST THE WALL - she gets up on her tiptoes, he bends down, etc., are the exact same adjustments I've had to make, when there was only a 7" difference in height. So with a height difference of 14"-16", I was constantly "choreographing" in my head to see if certain elements of love scenes were even possible. IMO, many times, they were not. For example, he's on top, inside her - unless he's a contortionist or EXTREMELY flexible, I didn't believe he could ALSO be nuzzling her neck. I wanted these two to be closer in height, OR the adjustments to be more extreme - she stands on a box or a step, or he picks her up to kiss her, for example.

Another peeve; they were both a little too good at sex. Enthusiastic, I can believe, but with a partner you don't know, and without much experience on either side, there's usually some clumsiness.

Tanner went into prison as a young man of twenty (who at that age are rarely as sexually experienced as they brag) and hasn't been with a woman since. How can he be that good, that he knows where and how to touch, able to hold back, etc.? He should've been fumbling a little, perhaps even beating her to the finish line, in Round One. As for Jess, "She wasn't a virgin, but she wasn't a slut, either." If this book hadn't been so good otherwise (and if it wasn't on my Kindle), I would've pitched it against the wall at that line.

I enjoy romances where one or both leads are virgins, OR relatively inexperienced, OR where one or both are EXTREMELY sexually experienced. Or anywhere in between, provided the writing is good and the sexual tension is high. I can also deal with a book where slut-shaming goes on, as something a character has to deal with, or must overcome from inside her own head. But it pushes all my hot buttons to have a character/author casually toss off something like that, reinforcing the cultural slut-shaming message of no/little sex = good girl; much sex = slutty/bad girl.

That said, the sex scenes were VERY hot, in unusual locations (see title), and if you don't have my tape-measuring fetish or my hot button issues, those things probably won't bother you.

I liked that the ended was not a quick HEA, but there were legal complications to be resolved from the actions Jess and Tanner took. I loved Jess's family, especially her parents, and their courage and ingenuity. It's well worth reading for fans of romantic suspense who want an action hero different from all the SEALs and cops and werewolves and such. show less

Superb climbing book by the guy who cut Joe Simpson's rope. This is about an expedition to climb the central Tower of Paine (nothing off-putting about that name!) in Patagonia. He has an engaging style, less professional than Simpson as a writer but probably more honest. His other one is good too.

This book is so incoherent, badly written and plain that it is a wonder it should have been published at all. This can only be due to two facts:
The fame that deflected from Joe Simpson on his partner in the wake of "Touching the void".
And people like me who will read anything even loosely connected with climbing they can get their hands on.
I even think I'd already read it before. But I wouldn't be able to tell...