Absolute Friends

It's a mark of Le Carré's talent, and what places him at the top of the four great British spy writers, that this is a fairly long novel (400+ pages paperback) and yet nothing happens to the plot for the first three quarters of it. Everything is devoted to Le Carré's great skill, that of building characters with a huge, if hidden, interior depth. Two novellas and a short story are spent on building backstory of the two characters, and what is for once in Le Carré a friendly relationship, rather than as adversaries of history.

The final denouement is brief, brutal and as other reviewers have said, angry. It's set in a post 9/11 context, but it's even more convincing now a few years later. Perhaps the spooks hadn't reached such a show more level of cynical double-dealing back when this was written, although it's no surprise now. It's still an unexpected outcome, although it's not so much foreshadowed a few pages earlier, as we're given the whole script for it. But we're no more likely to take the hint than our hero was. Now that's Le Carré being truly angry at the whole edifice of Western hypocrisy and writing himself into a role as the postscript chorus.

Not an accessible book or a light read, but Le Carré at his very best. show less

Read: Absolute Friends, John le Carré

This is an angry book. It was published in 2003, after the US/UK invasion of Iraq, something le Carré plainly did not support (who did, other than right-wingers, greedy industrialists and venal politicians?). The two friends of the title are Edward Mundy and Sasha (cannot remember if his surname is mentioned, it probably is). Mundy was born in Lahore just before it became part of Pakistan. His father was a disgraced officer in the Indian army, his mother was aristocracy but died in childbirth. After Partition, Mundy and his father returned to the UK, where Mundy attended public school, then Cambridge, then moved to Berlin and became caught up in the anarchist movement there. Which is where he met show more Sasha. Mundy was booted out of Berlin after being arrested at a demo. He joined the British Council, where he acted as escort and factotum for various UK artistic troupes touring East Europe, And so was consequently recruited by MI6. And also ran into Sasha, in East Berlin, where he was now a Stasi officer. Sasha recruits Mundy as a Stasi asset, but is really himself a MI6 asset using Mundy as the go-between. The Berlin Wall falls some time later and their careers come to an end. In the present day, Mundy is pulled out of “retirement” by Sasha, who wants to recruit him to a scheme run by a philanthropic oligarch (2024 readers will immediately be suspicious here, with good reason). Nothing, of course, is as it seems, and nothing ends well. Le Carré’s views on Bush and Blair are clear, even if neither is mentioned in the novel. The plot leaps about chronologically but is never confusing. If the book has a flaw, it’s that its story implies redemption but finally offers the opposite. It’s a good novel, well-written and impressively researched; and it’ll make you as angry as le Carré was when he wrote it. show less

Attraverso un'amicizia nata a Berlino sulle barricate del '68, tra due ragazzi, l'uno inglese e l'altro tedesco, Le Carré sviluppa una storia di spionaggio che vedrà Ted e Sascha impegnati come spie sui lati opposti del Muro. Ma ciò che ha resistito alle tensioni della Guerra Fredda si sgretolerà di fronte ai giochi di potere del nuovo millennio. Dopo la seconda guerra in Iraq, i due ex agenti si incontrano ancora, un ultima volta: il piano in cui Sascha è coinvolto è un ambizioso progetto di contro informazione per colpire l'America e gli interessi delle multinazionali. Ma di fronte agli scenari prefigurati da Le Carrè - peggiori di quelli emersi nel caso Kelly - anche Ted e Sascha saranno spiazzati e la Guerra Fredda, con le show more sue regole, apparirà, ormai, un gioco da ragazzi.

Berlino, 1968. In un clima di rivolta e di resa dei conti con il passato, l'inglese Ted Mundy salva la vita a un giovane tedesco di nome Sascha. Tra il primo, figlio di un maggiore dell'esercito britannico in India, e Sascha, visionario leader studentesco, nasce una "amicizia assoluta". Un legame più forte dei vincoli famigliari, capace di sopportare lunghe assenze e superare le più grandi prove della storia. Perché Ted e Sascha si trovano ad agire come spie sui lati opposti del Muro, nemici all'apparenza, in realtà una coppia di doppi agenti formidabilmente oliata grazie al vincolo di lealtà personale. Sono anni spesi a proteggere le proprie delicate coperture, anni di rischi sempre crescenti, di viaggi dall'esito terribilmente incerto, dove una parola sbagliata o un appuntamento con un informatore possono costare la vita. Ma ciò che è stato in grado di resistere alla Guerra Fredda si incrina improvvisamente con il Nuovo Ordine Mondiale. Dopo la seconda guerra in Iraq, Sascha, sessantenne, ricontatta Ted per l'ultima volta: un miliardario dalle mani non troppo pulite - per riscattarsi - incarica Sascha di mettere in piedi un ambizioso progetto di contro informazione. Obiettivo: colpire la superpotenza americana e gli interessi delle multinazionali. Ma chi è veramente il misterioso committente e cosa vale l'esperienza dei due ex agenti di fronte ai nuovi giochi di potere? Riprendendo i suoi motivi più classici, John le Carré ci propone un romanzo di feroce e lucida denuncia politica, capace di prefigurare scenari peggiori di quelli emersi nel caso Kelly, e dove la Guerra Fredda, con le sue regole, appare, ormai, un gioco da ragazzi. show less

I'm of two minds on this. Mostly, I really loved it. It is powerfully written and the main characters are interesting. They are very real and flawed and so much more interesting because I want them to have something good happen to them, despite all thier flaws. That is where I am mixed. I expected something like the ending but it still left me feeling like I was listening to the news; depressed and helpless. Oh, and bitter. LeCarre is always good at the moral universe inhabited by spies but here he really extends the cynical outlook and makes a much more worldly statement about ulterior motives and double dealings, etc. I agree with him more than I can state but it does make me feel very sad and down when the novel ends. I can't say show more that is a bad thing but I think I'm going to read something more cheerful next. show less

The next book off my shelf was John Le Carré's Absolute Friends published in 2003 and so one of his later novels. We meet Ted Munday as a tour guide in Heidelberg, Germany: struggling to make a living and to cement a relationship with Zara his muslim common law wife. After a days work he is troubled and seeks the aid of his mysterious friend Sacha. From this point on in typical Le Carré mode the backstory of Ted Munday and his friend Sacha is filled in, which takes up the majority of the book. Being le Carré it is no surprise to discover Ted's links with the British secret service and the interest is in how he finds himself now in a desperate position. Who is Sacha and what is Ted doing seemingly cast adrift and working in show more Germany.

There are few better authors at filling in the back story of characters in an espionage novel and Le Carré is in fine form with Bundy and Sacha. Bundy however is a man who seems to let things happen to him rather than chasing after them and so his work as a spy stretches credence a little. Perhaps this is why Absolute Friends is not very highly ranked in Le Carre's oeuvre. Le Carré's later novels also seem world weary and the intelligence services come in for much criticism, he has also become more and more anti-American and it is no surprise who are the villains in this book. Having said all this I found Absolute Friends superb entertainment and Le Carré's somewhat jaundiced view of the world's situation chimed particularly with the way that I feel. 4.5 stars show less

The story unfolds somewhat slowly, built around a vivid depiction of the intense and unlikely friendship that develops between Pakistani-born Brit Ted Mundy and German left-wing radical Sasha, who meet in the turbulent environment of student dissent in 1960s West Berlin. The trust that develops between them is hard won and hard tested through their involvement in radical left politics of the 1960s, then cold war intrigue as both come to serve for decades as highly effective double agents working for the downfall of the soviet Eastern bloc and especially the hated Stasi of East Germany, and finally as pawns in a deadly scheme in the 21st century war on terror.

The dramatization of Mundy and Sasha’s relationship is brilliant. Though show more personal trust is the linchpin of their relationship, this is not simpleminded story that politics is superficial, unworthy of our attention – the province of mere fanatics who ware not to be trusted on any account. Indeed, it is their commitment in different ways to a politics of freedom and human decency that draws them together, and is bound up in their relationship as it evolves.
.
**Spoiler alert**

My one misgiving in the novel concerns the paranoid conclusion, in which it turns out that Sasha’s political passions, and Mundy’s commitment to Sasha as hope perhaps for a decent world, are manipulated by agents provocateurs committed to the hegemony of the US corporate state, and gunned down in a sham raid staged to silence European critics and dissenters in of the war on terrorism.

Is such a thing plausible? One would like to think that it is not. But since the novel’s publication some aspects of this kind of plot have been borne out by events – e.g. “terrorists” recruited by US intelligence operatives only to have their plans, which were really only ever the machinations of the US agents who manipulated them, foiled in highly public operations calculated to prove the need and efficacy of US intelligence operations, and the targeted assassination of US citizens deemed by US administration officials to be enemy combatants. Given those developments, and recent revelations of spying, one really does not have terribly firm grounds for dismissing the plot climax as paranoid delusion.

But in the end, the plausibility of the novel’s concluding plot device is far less important than the plausibility of the two main characters commitment to a politics of resistance to injustice and oppression in the face of profound uncertainties, and their related commitment to each other as friends. This is the thread of integrity which le Carre offers in a world in which truth of any kind is virtually impossible to find. show less

Novels fuelled by fury are justly rare and rarely satisfying but le Carre's vast experience sustains him in the creation of this ferocious denunciation of the betrayal of trust by Western governments in their complicity over the War On Terror and the invasion of Iran. Ted Mundy is the honourable Everyman who becomes involved in dangerous espionage for a country that callously discards him to shore up its dishonest war. The contrast between state ethics and the loyalty of its agent is at the heart of this polemic.