The Democratic Paradox

Another solid contribution from Chantal Mouffe. Approaches the notion of liberal democracy by way of the concept of paradox, due to the fundamental, constitutive tension (and mutual "contamination" as she puts it) between democracy and liberalism.
Mouffe argues that, contrary to the current "third way" type of politics that claims to have eschewed right- and left-wing as political categories--that claims to have gone beyond political conflict, there is in fact a need to recognize the inherently conflictual nature of democratic politics, and that attempts to sidestep it are bad for democracies.

One particularly interesting insight from Mouffe is that, with regard to the inherent agonism of (liberal?) democracies, not just the neo-liberal, show more third wave folks but also the pomo, fuzzy thinking leftitsts of today have it wrong, because while they recognize and even valorize "confrontation with the other" or even "infinite controntation with the other", they see such interaction as possible without actual conflict, without antagonism which, Mouffe argues, is essential to politics.

The one disappointing thing about this book is that it seems basically to just build on and re-iterate themes from The Return of the Political, without really introducing anything very new. show less

From the theory of 'deliberative democracy' to the politics of the 'third way', the present Zeitgeist is characterized by attempts to deny what Chantal Mouffe contends is the inherently conflictual nature of democratic politics. Far from being signs of progress, such ideas constitute a serious threat to democratic institutions. Taking issue with John Rawls and J rgen Habermas on one side, and the political tenets of Blair, Clinton and Schr der on the other, Mouffe brings to the fore the paradoxical nature of modern liberal democracy in which the category of the 'adversary' plays a central role. She draws on the work of Wittgenstein, Derrida, and the provocative theses of Carl Schmitt, to propose a new understanding of democracy which show more acknowledges the ineradicability of antagonism in its workings. show less