This was a poignant book for me because Weimar Germany reminds me so much of the modern United States. The overall argument the the author makes is that the fall of Weimar Germany was not inevitable. It was destroyed by anti-democratic actors from within. This period of German history has such relevance today. It's worth reading about. ( )

מרתק. גם בגלל הנושא וגם בגלל הכתיבה. הסיפור של המקום והזמן המעניינים ביותר בתולדות הזמן החדש. עם זאת לא חסר מגבלות. חזרות רבות ומיותרות, חלקן מילולית. היצמדות גדולה מדי למספר קטן של אישים בתור דוגמה ודגש מוגזם על ארכיטקטורה. ( )

In his book, Weitz provides a very readable introduction to the Weimar period that tries to look at almost every aspect of the period. However, this is also it weakness. Weitz seems to have had more interest in the cultural topics of the period and in my opinion skimped on the history sections. This is not to say that Weitz has written a bad history but that he could have gone more in-depth on the actual historical outline of the period. One of the great things about Weitz’s book is by breaking up the book into topical chapters Weiz allows the reader to strategically choose what themes of Weimar Germany to read about. If you want to read about the visual arts there’s a chapter on that, while if architecture is your interest you can read about the great builders like Erich Mendelsohn and Walter Gropius. Yet I do wish he had gone into more detail about some of the Avant-garde painters like Otto Dix and George Grosz. Overall, even with my gripes I still appreciate what Weitz tried to do and am happy that there is more of an interest in Weimar other than as a stepping stone to WW2 and would recommend this book as a great starting place to learn about the period. ( )

A generally very fine study of Weimar Germany. Weitz delights in the positive things about the Weimar Republic - its experimentation, its liberalism, its forward-looking society and its attempts to throw off the old. He also develops his theme, that it was precidsely that 'old' Germany that undermined the Weimar Republic and delivered it into the waiting hands of the Nazis.

There is much here that was new to me; the account of the fall of the German government in 1918, and the analysis of the German Right before the Nazis, for example. Weitz shows that the Nazis were merely the most effective of a series of right-wing parties and groupings, and that much of what we think of as Nazi terminology was actually the common political language of the day. The Nazis only succeeded because they set out to seize power at any cost, including the exercise of force. At the same time, they were expertly organised for growth, and they captured hearts and minds by appealing directly to the population and by acting in practical ways, by organising charitable appeals.

But this is more than just a book about Hitler (unlike so many other books about this period of German history). (Indeed, Hitler is just another bit-player in the last chapter; Third Reich fans will have to look elsewhere for their fix.) Weitz covers a range of different topics about life in Weimar Germany - politics, culture, city life, architecture, the media and sex are all covered in turn.

I have one reservation about this book. Chapter two, "Walking the city", is an exploration of Weimar Berlin partly written as a walking travelogue, depicting the sights, sounds and experiences of a typical Berlin citizen. But Weritz has chosen to write a part of this in the first person plural, present tense ("Perhaps we really want to hear some jazz...") and switches back to third person singular, past tense for explanatory sections without warning. This is an irritating enough literary device when it's used properly; but the sudden shifts of perspective did make me grit my teeth rather.

But that shouldn't take away from the importance of this book. It is probably the best exploration of the reasons behind the rise of the Nazis that I have come across, with the added bonus of a detailed and loving description of Weimar Germany at the same time. And we see the rise of the Nazis from their contemporary viewpoint, rather than looking back from our historical one and treating their history and rise as merely the personal history of Adolf Hitler. Some people make much of the supposed fact that Hitler was democratically elected: in fact, he merely led the largest party, rather than holding an outright majority. Our modern politicians would do well to ponder the implications of that fact. ( )

A terrific walking-tour history of the Weimar Republic. ( )