QED: A Play

by Peter Parnell

On This Page

Description

ÊQEDÊ is a seductive mix of science human affections moral courage and comic eccentricity... not to be missed. ä John Simon ÊNew York MagazineÊÞÞThe play itself is a kind of proof dramatically illustrating how a man who happens to be a genius elegantly and movingly works through the human problem of how to face the end of his life. ä Nancy Franklin The New YorkerÞÞWith a moving and powerful introduction from Alan Alda.ÞÞWho knew that quantum electrodynamics could make for a show more dramatic read? In the hands of the late great physicist Richard Feynman it does. Feynman's theory of QED is just one of the many topics the playwright Peter Parnell explores in this nearly-one-man show a recent Broadway triumph for star Alan Alda as Feynman.ÞÞSet in Feynman's office on the weekend of his realization that he has terminal cancer this play is an intellectual tour-de-force that captures the unique hilarious and puckish genius that Feynman was. From his work on the Manhattan Project to the death of his beloved first wife from his mission to reconstruct the Challenger space shuttle tragedy to his Nobel-prize winning physics ideas the resume of Feynman's life is fascinating. But Parnell gives us more letting fill in the details of his life. When he reads a letter he wrote to his wife after her death or flirts with a student or chillingly recalls walking around Manhattan calculating the damage an atomic bomb could do we grow to love the man behind the scientist. And we read in fascination as he puzzles out the problem of his own death.ÞÞCombining the current interest in science and math in the entertainment world with one of the most entertaining scientists in U.S. history QED is a tour-de-force. show less

Tags

Recommendations

Member Reviews

1 review
What is essentially a one-man play about Richard Feynman; the only other character appears only briefly, and appears rather gratuitous. It takes place near the end of Feynman's life, as he was still struggling with the government over the report on the failed Challenger O-ring. He discusses physics briefly, but the piece is more about him personally; his preferences in travel and music, his enjoyment of amateur theatricals that he has a small part in; his first wife, and a bit of reminiscing on the building of the bomb, though he seems more interested in his ability to crack locks, including the lock that held all the secrets of the bomb. A decent piece of work, but there are definite weak spots, especially involving the student. She show more should have either had a bigger part, or been left out. The interaction is unsatisfactory, and feels gratuitous. The strength of the play is letting Feynman do the speaking for himself - using his own words, from the many books he wrote. Not a bad way to be introduced to Feynman, but his own books are better if you're interested in either physics or Feynman. show less

Members

Recently Added By

Lists

Author Information

Picture of author.
14+ Works 3,278 Members

Work Relationships

Common Knowledge

Original publication date
2002

Classifications

Genre
Fiction and Literature
DDC/MDS
812.54Literature & rhetoricAmerican literature in EnglishAmerican drama in English20th Century1945-1999
LCC
PS3566 .A752 .Q43Language and LiteratureAmerican literatureAmerican literatureIndividual authors1961-
BISAC

Statistics

Members
45
Popularity
660,848
Reviews
1
Rating
(4.00)
Languages
English
Media
Paper
ISBNs
1
UPCs
1