Tactics: A Game Plan for Discussing Your Christian Convictions

Even though this book is focused on how Christians can discuss their worldview with others, you don't have to be a believer to get a treasure trove of methods to hold discussions with people who hold opposing views to your own.

Greg's premise is to think of yourself as an ambassador for what you believe and not as a marauder trying to club someone over the head with your convictions. He says something in the beginning that I've been trying to keep in mind during my own discussions; if you're in an argument (meaning a difference of an opinion. It doesn't have to devolve into bickering and posturing), trying to persuade someone on your point of view, and you get upset, you lose. If the other person gets upset, you lose. You need to remain show more calm, ask more questions than you make assertions, and have a civil tone that represents how much you want them to understand you.

The book is chalk full of examples on how people use poor logic, make self defeating statements, hold opposing viewpoints, and have never really thought through some of the things they say. He gives ways to point out the flaws in this - in a way that isn't offensive - so you can plant a stone in their shoe and give them something to think about. As Greg says, the goal isn't to hit a home run with every encounter, just getting up to bat is sometimes the objective. Someone else will advance the runners.

Even though this book is focused on Christianity, anyone could take the principles he oulines here and use them when discussing the hot button issues that surround us today. When debating matters of politics and public policy, many people just throw out slogans and lines they've heard from other places without taking the time to think them through. Helping people to see this, in the way of an ambassador, would do a lot to calm the level of frustration and bickering that usually turns out to be the result of one of these discussions show less

For a long time, I have taken a great interest in apologetics. I have a formal qualification in formal logic and, even if I didn't, it's a passion I cultivate in my spare time. I also take an avid interest in analytical philosophy, broader philosophy and world history between 500 BC to 500 AD.

These things I have tried to cultivate to the end of defending my faith for anyone who asks for an account of what I believe (1 Peter 3:15).

But apologetics doesn't work that way, as I learnt the hard way. When you are trying to love God with your mind (Luke 10:27) it doesn't help to simply know the facts. It definitely doesn't help to just give the facts (although I suppose there may be times when that is all that's required but no-one likes an show more info-dump).

So this book could not have come sooner. The skills presented here are simple and practical methods to navigate spiritual conversations without needlessly upsetting people when opposing views are at play. show less

Using questions to engage in conversation

This is a book about engaging in conversations about faith, especially applied to apologetics. Koukl provides a number of tactical techniques to take control of a conversation (in the sense of guiding it, not dominating it) in order to help reveal the deeper beliefs and assumptions held by others, in hopes that this will open people to the truth of the gospel. In many ways, the techniques taught here could be applied to many types of conversations, and not just apologetic ventures. But applied to apologetics and evangelism, with sensitivity, these conversation tools hold promise of opening, rather than closing ears.

While very helpful, I did find Koukl's approach to be terse at times. But this is show more likely in part due to his offering digested accounts of the conversations he records for illustration purposes. Another minor weakness in the book is Koukl's reference to Darwinian evolution almost as a view without merit, when contrasted to his apparently preferred ID view. Holding this position is fine, but I suspect what he means by Darwinism is primarily a rejection of naturalistic Darwinism as a worldview. It would help for him to nuance this point a bit more, since the topic is raised a number of times.

That said, Koukl does much to help elevate the Christian's confidence to be able to gently but firmly ask questions of others leading to opportunities to speak about Jesus. show less

Tactics is one of the most important books you could choose to read, though I would encourage the 10th anniversary edition of the same if you have to pick. Greg Koukl doesn't present tactics for proving Christianity true, though he certainly argues that effectively.

Rather, he presents methods for holding difficult conversations, regardless of the subject. While these are presented in the context of Christian beliefs, they can be applied to political discussions, family arguments, business meetings. These tactics are useful in all areas of life.

I easily consider this one of the top ten books everyone should read, and the younger the better.

But that I've read only two books on evangelism methods so far, I would say this is the best I've ever read. It would be difficult to find a set of tactics sharper or more clever. It was a good idea of me to add this book to my reading list as soon as I heard it, earlier this year.

Excellent book to teach the Christian that when people make statements, assertions, or opinions it's not our responsibility to defend our side. Koukl shows the reader that by asking probing questions the Christian can direct the conversation, and once motives, biases, and definitions are known they can then make a truthful assertion of their own by asking leading questions.

This is a great book and a quick read!

Excellent Read! and Excellently Read! thought provoking strategy to just just consider, but implement. and what a way to magnify God's truths as we engage others and hope for opportunities to share the hope that is in us. may we be better at asking questions to our lived ones and those the Lord puts in our path.