A Sadly Troubled History: The Meanings of Suicide in the Modern Age (McGill-Queen's/Associated Medical Services Studies in the History of Medicine, Health, and Society): Volume 33
by John C. Weaver
On This Page
Description
More people die by suicide each year than by homicide, wars, and terrorist attacks combined. Witnesses and survivors are left perplexed and troubled. Doctors, clinical psychologists, and social workers try to deal with it through their professional routines; sociologists and psychiatrists attempt to provide theoretical explanations of it. In a study of nearly 7000 suicides from 1900 to 1950 in New Zealand and Queensland, Australia, John Weaver documents the challenges that ordinary people show more experienced during turbulent times and, using witnesses' testimony, death bed statements, and suicide notes, reconstructs individuals' thoughts as they decide whether to endure their suffering. Bridging social and medical history, Weaver presents an intellectual and political history of suicide studies, a revealing construction and deconstruction of suicide rates, a discussion of gender, life stages, and socio-economic circumstances in relation to suicide patterns, reflections on reasoning processes and intent, and society's reactions to suicide, including medical intervention. A Sadly Troubled History marshals thousands of suicide inquests, replete with observations on the anxieties of unemployment, the heartbreak of romantic disappointment, the pain of domestic turmoil, and the torments of mental illness, to demonstrate that history - although, like biochemistry, sociology, psychology, and psychiatry, reliant on remarkable yet imperfect information - can contribute to a better understanding of the suicidal act and its motives. show lessTags
Member Reviews
Faith in Narrative
Historiography in the (remedial) classroom is a narrative of enlightenment in which each new theorist is simply more clever than the last. Perhaps it's felicity with this kind of narrative that allows modern sociologists to dismiss Durkheim (On Suicide, 1897) as a prescriptivist of "social cohesion" and misguided victim of the ecological fallacy. An updated Dictionary of Received Ideas (Flaubert, 1913) would also include an entry on Freud: "Only known victim of the Oedipal complex. Laugh at it pityingly for being quaint and old-fashioned; even so: Thunder Against!" This, of course, discounts Freud's frightening ability, unique among his contemporaries, to have a real Thought. (Freud's Thought still lives on in show more un-death, although our best Freudians (e.g. Julia Kristeva) are all anti-Freudian . . .) Similarly, it was Durkheim's power (now despised) to look behind narrative in order to tell us something we don't already know. His early statistical analysis of seasonal variation in suicide simultaneously undermined narratives of Winter's "moribund dreariness" and Summer's "heat-induced madness."
Narratives are never adequate to the stories they tell — especially the narratives we tell ourselves. This was the lesson of Durkheim's' nascent Sociology and Freud's early Psychology. (Durkheim and Freud only become "quaint and old-fashioned" in their hasty attempts to substitute a new totality for this inadequacy e.g. "social cohesion" and "Greek Tragedy.") Weaver's repudiations of Durkheim appear to come straight from the classroom narrative, scorning the half measures of such early attempts. Certainly more thorough groundwork has been done here, considering the author and his assistants appear to have read every inquest into mid-century suicide in Australasia, though one wonders what has been gleaned from all this. Weaver's findings, summarized in the table above, suggest the most common risk factors for suicide are mental illness, physical illness, alcoholism, and financial hardship i.e. precisely what we would have suspected had we given it any thought. Perhaps this analysis is only capable of telling us something we already know because it's the product of narratives that were already inadequate attempts at interpretation ex post facto. The magistrate, who is no more clever than us, signs the affidavit after concluding that, "certainly she was known to be partial to drink." The following movement, from judicial inquests to the sampling of suicide notes, is not much more fruitful (though Weaver gleans one useable poem). We find these notes also to be dissemblers along with the narratives they tell, exemplifying what Freud might understand as the displacement of the thought one cannot even admit to oneself. show less
Historiography in the (remedial) classroom is a narrative of enlightenment in which each new theorist is simply more clever than the last. Perhaps it's felicity with this kind of narrative that allows modern sociologists to dismiss Durkheim (On Suicide, 1897) as a prescriptivist of "social cohesion" and misguided victim of the ecological fallacy. An updated Dictionary of Received Ideas (Flaubert, 1913) would also include an entry on Freud: "Only known victim of the Oedipal complex. Laugh at it pityingly for being quaint and old-fashioned; even so: Thunder Against!" This, of course, discounts Freud's frightening ability, unique among his contemporaries, to have a real Thought. (Freud's Thought still lives on in show more un-death, although our best Freudians (e.g. Julia Kristeva) are all anti-Freudian . . .) Similarly, it was Durkheim's power (now despised) to look behind narrative in order to tell us something we don't already know. His early statistical analysis of seasonal variation in suicide simultaneously undermined narratives of Winter's "moribund dreariness" and Summer's "heat-induced madness."
Narratives are never adequate to the stories they tell — especially the narratives we tell ourselves. This was the lesson of Durkheim's' nascent Sociology and Freud's early Psychology. (Durkheim and Freud only become "quaint and old-fashioned" in their hasty attempts to substitute a new totality for this inadequacy e.g. "social cohesion" and "Greek Tragedy.") Weaver's repudiations of Durkheim appear to come straight from the classroom narrative, scorning the half measures of such early attempts. Certainly more thorough groundwork has been done here, considering the author and his assistants appear to have read every inquest into mid-century suicide in Australasia, though one wonders what has been gleaned from all this. Weaver's findings, summarized in the table above, suggest the most common risk factors for suicide are mental illness, physical illness, alcoholism, and financial hardship i.e. precisely what we would have suspected had we given it any thought. Perhaps this analysis is only capable of telling us something we already know because it's the product of narratives that were already inadequate attempts at interpretation ex post facto. The magistrate, who is no more clever than us, signs the affidavit after concluding that, "certainly she was known to be partial to drink." The following movement, from judicial inquests to the sampling of suicide notes, is not much more fruitful (though Weaver gleans one useable poem). We find these notes also to be dissemblers along with the narratives they tell, exemplifying what Freud might understand as the displacement of the thought one cannot even admit to oneself. show less
Members
- Recently Added By
Lists
Books Cited in Wasteland by W. Scott Poole
120 works; 1 member
Author Information
4 Works 40 Members
John C. Weaver is professor of history, McMaster University
Classifications
- Genres
- Nonfiction, History, Sociology
- DDC/MDS
- 362.28 — Social sciences Social problems and social services Social problems of and services to groups of people Mental illness Suicide
- LCC
- HV6548 .N45 .W43 — Social sciences Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology Crimes and offenses
- BISAC
Statistics
- Members
- 4
- Popularity
- 3,419,556
- Reviews
- 1
- Rating
- (1.00)
- Languages
- English
- Media
- Paper, Ebook
- ISBNs
- 2



