Hide this

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Pygmalion by George Bernard Shaw

Pygmalion (1913)

by George Bernard Shaw

Other authors: See the other authors section.

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingMentions
3,745411,389 (3.83)95

Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book.

No current Talk conversations about this book.

» See also 95 mentions

English (38)  Norwegian (1)  Hebrew (1)  Dutch (1)  All languages (41)
Showing 1-5 of 38 (next | show all)
I like G.B. Shaw's intent to create a play demonstrating the large variety of way the English speak English (and the comedy involved with the variations, of course!). Higgins, a professor of linguistics can be a downright rude character but at the same time, speaks the truth in such an entertaining way that it's hard not to like him at least remotely. Eliza Doolittle's development from an uneducated flower-girl who is silly into a young woman who has grown to understand herself more and learn her self-worth through the six months of living with that insufferable Higgins is one that I found new for the age, but proper for a time when "feminism" was beginning to bloom. I really enjoyed that this isn't your traditional love-centered story. This isn't a comedy ending in engagements or marriage proposals, and I like how the play ends with a possibility that Eliza may marry someone in the future, but that by no means it is the most important thing in her life. The most important thing is that she has in a way "found" herself while trying to be someone she's not. She has learned her self-worth and wants her independence, which is something grand.

With that said, it is really a wonderful play, but for some reason I wasn't too drawn into it as I read. No doubt it would be TONS better on stage. Maybe if I read it again in the future or see it on stage I'll be more enthusiastic about it.
  est-lm | May 3, 2014 |
Pygmalion, in my opinion, is Shaw's piece de resistance (if that is how you spell it). It is a masterpiece. While I can simply leave it at that I am compelled to say a lot more about this play, but first, the plot.
Two English gentlemen (and when I read this book I wondered if it was implied that they were homosexual) bet as to whether they can take a street urchin and turn her into a lady by teaching her how to speak proper English. They do and the experiment is successful, and the bet is won. However the problem is that the woman, Eliza, is left in a difficult position as despite the fact that she is now educated, she is still a woman and has all the rights of a woman - which is none. So, while Henry Higgins has proven that he can turn a street urchin into a lady, she is still a woman and is left in the situation that she cannot do anything with the education that she now has.
This play is an attack upon education and upon the status of women in early 20th Century England. They simply had no rights and while they could learn and they could appear to move among the gentry, the fact that they were women relegated them to a second class status. It is said that the system of education was one of the areas that Shaw attacked in his plays, and in this play we see how despite Liza having an education, she knows that she can do nothing with it, and is not recognised as having an education.
This play has spawned a lot of duplicates, one of them being a play by Willy Russell called Educating Rita. I read that book in year 11 when I returned to high school and my English teacher loved it because he believed that it showed us how an education can change us. After reading Pygmalion I believed that that play was left for dead (and still do). However there are differences, namely that the status of women in the mid-twentieth century had changed dramatically. However, the theme is still the same, in that a woman from the working class, through education, was able to lift herself out of the working class.
Another spawn would be an Eddie Murphy movie called Trading Places. Here two incredibly wealthy men make a bet that they could turn a bum into a successful Wall Street Trader, and turn the successful Wall Street Trader into a common criminal. Like Henry Higgins in Pygmalion, they succeed, but further, they have no understanding of the power of education, because after turning the bum into a successful trader, they realise that they cannot simply send him back to the streets. He has become educated, and in becoming educated he has the power to fight back, which he does so successfully.
It is a shame that Shaw has disappeared into relative obscurity. I do not see any of his plays being performed (though being stuck in the little backwater that is Adelaide means that we see very little in the way of good theatre, or more correctly, what I consider good theatre). Still, beggars can't be choosers, but the educated have the world at their doorstep. ( )
  David.Alfred.Sarkies | Apr 4, 2014 |
I found myself very interested in this play. I knew a lot about it before reading it, but that didn't stop me being interested. It was funny, well written and I enjoyed it a lot. ( )
  bookish92 | Mar 20, 2014 |
This is the original story that 'My Fair Lady" was based o. The original is more gritty and less huerous than the movie. Shaw, not at his best, but in his amusing phase. ( )
  siubhank | Sep 25, 2013 |
The third in my crash course of Shaw plays, and I like it better than [b:Arms and the Man|383018|Arms and the Man|George Bernard Shaw|http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1327965588s/383018.jpg|628265] but not as well as [b:Candida|418373|Candida|George Bernard Shaw|http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1327970073s/418373.jpg|1586414]. It's certainly weightier than Candida in its subject matter, but it paradoxically spends less time on its important questions. The scenes feel so quick and breezy that you're challenged to describe what even happens during them. The characters are memorable but mostly undeveloped; the two most developed are Higgins (insufferable) and Liza (insufficiently developed). Everyone else is just sort of filling space. Overall, this play suffers greatly from its brevity, whereas Candida benefitted by it. ( )
  blake.rosser | Jul 28, 2013 |
Showing 1-5 of 38 (next | show all)
no reviews | add a review

» Add other authors (56 possible)

Author nameRoleType of authorWork?Status
George Bernard Shawprimary authorall editionsconfirmed
Cochran, ShannonAudio Performersecondary authorsome editionsconfirmed
Pennell, NicholasAudio Performersecondary authorsome editionsconfirmed
Topolski, FeliksIllustratorsecondary authorsome editionsconfirmed
You must log in to edit Common Knowledge data.
For more help see the Common Knowledge help page.
Series (with order)
Canonical title
Original title
Alternative titles
Original publication date
Important places
Important events
Related movies
Awards and honors
First words
The Daughter: I'm getting chilled to the bone.
Women upset everything. When you let them into your life, you find that the woman is driving at one thing and you're driving at another.
It is impossible for an Englishman to open his mouth without making some other Englishman hate or despise him.
The English have no respect for their language, and will not teach their children to speak it.
What is life but a series of inspired follies? The difficulty is to find them to do. Never lose a chance: it doesn't come every day.
Last words
(Click to show. Warning: May contain spoilers.)
Disambiguation notice
Publisher's editors
Publisher series
Original language

References to this work on external resources.

Wikipedia in English


Book description
Haiku summary

Amazon.com Product Description (ISBN 0486282228, Paperback)

A rousing success on the London and New York stages, a popular film, and a great musical hit ("My Fair Lady"), this brilliantly written play, with its irresistible theme of the emerging butterfly, is one of the most acclaimed comedies in the English language. Includes Shaw's Preface and "Sequel."

(retrieved from Amazon Mon, 30 Sep 2013 13:41:29 -0400)

(see all 5 descriptions)

Pygmalion both delighted and scandalized its first audiences in 1914. A brilliantly witty reworking of the classical tale of the sculptor who falls in love with his perfect female statue, it is also a barbed attack on the British class system and a statement of Shaw's feminist views. In Shaw's hands, the phoneticist Henry Higgins is the Pygmalion figure who believes he can transform Eliza Doolittle, a cockney flower girl, into a duchess at ease in polite society. The one thing he overlooks is that his 'creation' has a mind of her own. This is the definitive text produced under the editorial supervision of Dan H. Laurence, with an illuminating introduction by Nicholas Grene, discussing the language and politics of the play. Also included in this volume is Shaw's preface, as well as his 'sequel' written for the first publication in 1916, to rebut public demand for a more conventionally romantic ending.… (more)

» see all 14 descriptions

Quick Links

Popular covers


Average: (3.83)
1 8
1.5 7
2 40
2.5 9
3 153
3.5 47
4 272
4.5 35
5 168


Four editions of this book were published by Audible.com.

See editions

Penguin Australia

An edition of this book was published by Penguin Australia.

» Publisher information page

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.


Help/FAQs | About | Privacy/Terms | Blog | Contact | LibraryThing.com | APIs | WikiThing | Common Knowledge | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | 92,127,822 books! | Top bar: Always visible