Picture of author.

Martin Hengel (1926–2009)

Author of Crucifixion

63+ Works 2,437 Members 10 Reviews 1 Favorited

About the Author

Martin Hengel is Emeritus Professor of New Testament and Early Judaism at the University of Tubingen, Germany

Includes the names: Martin Hengel, Martín Hengel

Image credit: vimeo

Works by Martin Hengel

Crucifixion (1977) 417 copies, 5 reviews
The Johannine Question (1989) 71 copies
The Pre-Christian Paul (1991) 57 copies
The Cross of the Son of God (1997) 52 copies
Christ and Power (1974) 38 copies
Was Jesus a revolutionist? (1971) 31 copies
Earliest Christianity (1997) 26 copies
Jesús y la violencia revolucionaria (1973) 7 copies, 1 review
Judentum und Hellenismus. (1973) 3 copies
Raising the Bar 1 copy, 1 review

Associated Works

Tagged

Common Knowledge

Birthdate
1926-12-14
Date of death
2009-07-02
Gender
male
Education
University of Tübingen
Occupations
professor
Organizations
University of Erlangen
University of Tübingen
Nationality
Germany
Places of residence
Reutlingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Associated Place (for map)
Baden-Württemberg, Germany

Members

Reviews

11 reviews
This book has a bad start thanks to Robert Hanhart's polemical “Introduction”. Not content to merely skate his theologumenon of Canonicity across thin ice, he decides to build a castle on it. One does not have to look far to see people completely turned off from the Septuagint (and the rest of the book) by this essay alone. Ironically, it was his tendentious, unsupported, a priori assertions that strengthened my interest in the textual authority of the LXX and launched me into Hengel's show more book in hopes of finding the grain sifted from Hanhart's chaff. I was only occasionally disappointed. What tarnishes this incredible (and approvingly short) book is Hengel's constant and unimpressive quoting of sources in their original languages--sometimes at great length--without any translation either of his own or another's. In the end, Hengel's answer to the historical question “why did Christians accept the 'apocryphal' texts into their canon?” is quite anti-climactic. In addition, although Hengel attributes the authorship of Daniel to about 165 BC, his arguments affectively annul the possibility of any such dating. “The inclusion of...Daniel...was based...on a 'historical error'” (p.91). “The fact that the book of Daniel...was received so quickly and without hesitation seems to be almost a miracle...” (p.95). Rather than suggest one believe in miracles and strangely incoherent historical errors, Hengel's arguments affirm that Daniel must be dated to the epoch of revelation between Moses and Artaxerxes in order to make historical sense of its uncontested place in the Pharisaic canon. show less
½
A daring proposal for the future of evangelical new Testament scholarship.

Awards

You May Also Like

Associated Authors

Statistics

Works
63
Also by
7
Members
2,437
Popularity
#10,528
Rating
4.0
Reviews
10
ISBNs
135
Languages
4
Favorited
1

Charts & Graphs