Simon Kinberg
Author of Sherlock Holmes [2009 film]
About the Author
Image credit: Simon Kinberg at the 2015 San Diego Comic Con International in San Diego, California. By Gage Skidmore, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=41632346
Works by Simon Kinberg
The Twilight Zone (2019): Season Two — Creator — 6 copies
Invasion [2021 TV miniseries] — Creator — 1 copy
Associated Works
Star Wars Rebels: The Complete Season 4 — Writer — 37 copies
Tagged
Common Knowledge
- Canonical name
- Kinberg, Simon
- Legal name
- Kinberg, Simon David
- Birthdate
- 1973-08-02
- Occupations
- screenwriter
- Nationality
- UK (birth)
USA - Birthplace
- Hammersmith, London, England, UK
- Map Location
- England, UK
Members
Reviews
The government weaponizes a cure for superpowers.
The action doesn't work. The characters don't make sense. (Phoenix, who is described as a creature of unfiltered joy and rage, just stands around doing nothing and looking vacant for most of the movie. And why is Professor X suddenly and inexplicably a villain? When did that happen?). There's nothing to the plot except an allegory which is undermined by its own idiotic writing. I mean, it's a movie about oppression which basically makes a case show more for oppression. Who are we even supposed to be rooting for in that last battle? The only good thing in the entire movie is the shamelessly cartoonish Juggernaut.
Concept: C
Story: D
Characters: F
Dialog: D
Pacing: C
Cinematography: C
Special effects/design: C
Acting: C
Music: C
Enjoyment: D
GPA: 1.5/4 show less
The action doesn't work. The characters don't make sense. (Phoenix, who is described as a creature of unfiltered joy and rage, just stands around doing nothing and looking vacant for most of the movie. And why is Professor X suddenly and inexplicably a villain? When did that happen?). There's nothing to the plot except an allegory which is undermined by its own idiotic writing. I mean, it's a movie about oppression which basically makes a case show more for oppression. Who are we even supposed to be rooting for in that last battle? The only good thing in the entire movie is the shamelessly cartoonish Juggernaut.
Concept: C
Story: D
Characters: F
Dialog: D
Pacing: C
Cinematography: C
Special effects/design: C
Acting: C
Music: C
Enjoyment: D
GPA: 1.5/4 show less
The disappointment of quickly realising that Fox still doesn't know what they're doing after three unquestionably good X-films in a row (Days of Future Past, Logan and Deadpool) really soured the first view of this film for me. An underwhelming by-the-numbers end of the world fight with more CGI than heart, and stuffed with characters who don't get to shine or develop because they're too busy being namechecked. In a lot of ways, this is therefore a rehash of the issues tormenting the Last show more Stand, though like that film, this one too does have some redeeming qualities that keeps it from being a complete waste. Magneto's early scenes are good, for instance (if very reminiscent of Wolverine's lumberjack stint in Origins), as are Xavier's late ones. In general, it does a decent job of building on some of the character arcs from earlier films, notably the prequel series' core three (Magneto, Mystique and Xavier), and there are a small handful of others in the onslaught of underserviced characters who get solid moments here (notably Quicksilver and, surprisingly, if to a lesser extent, Havok) and on rewatch, such elements have stood out enough that the film climbed from 2.5 to 3.5 stars for me. The main flaw, though, is a villain who never feels like more than an (admittedly scary) plot device, despite generous helpings of screentime. Isaac is a terrific actor, so I can only assume the blame for this lies in the script.
For all that, I still got teary eyed at the new context for the recalled lines from the end of the original "X-Men" as the film ended. So clearly, I was more invested than my whining here indicates. show less
For all that, I still got teary eyed at the new context for the recalled lines from the end of the original "X-Men" as the film ended. So clearly, I was more invested than my whining here indicates. show less
For a long-running franchise that basically started the entire era of superhero film to end on what's perhaps the weakest film they ever made is more sad than it is infuriating. But the film isn't completely without redeeming features -- finally exploring the darker side of Xavier's control issues and Messiah complex, while something that deserved a much better film than this, was a welcome development, and the arc for Beast and Mystique was both surprising and delivering several fine show more scenes. But as a whole, this was a soulless spectacle making the uneven previous installment "Apocalypse" suddenly look like it would have been a worthy finale. show less
I want to start with the information that I am a huge fan of the original stories. This was the first adaptation I saw. Guy Ritchie took a lot of liberties with the stories, which I usually hate, but I feel like Jude Law and Robert Downey Jr. were charming enough to make it work. (for the record I like the BBC Sherlock as well) I like that someone finally made Watson a young guy. Newly made doctor just back from the Afghanistan war, why would he be old? And I think that Robert Downey Jr. show more does a good job with Sherlock’s lack of emotion, while keeping him a funny and likeable character. I like that they took his boxing ability and made it into an interesting piece of the story, but they over-do it a little bit on the fight scenes and making it into an action movie. I didn’t like that Irene Adler is kind of a love interest—not a huge fan of romances, but I did like that a female character was given a stronger role than they ever get in the original stories. show less
Lists
Awards
You May Also Like
Associated Authors
Statistics
- Works
- 12
- Also by
- 8
- Members
- 4,400
- Popularity
- #5,690
- Rating
- 3.5
- Reviews
- 37
- ISBNs
- 33
- Languages
- 1
















