National Audubon Society

If you're looking for a good field ID guide, this is not it. Nearly useless as an ID book even if you don't mind carrying a huge paperback. The organization is weird. The little symbols that represent the outline of mushrooms don't correspond to the ones they assign them to. Since I can't show you pictures in this review, here's a verbal example. Coral fungus used to be grouped together in the old guide in a separate category with a little thumb symbol that looked like a branched fungus. Now show more they're scattered throughout under icons that are just a generic mushroom with a stem and cap. What? Who the hell would look for coral fungus under that? Not one person, that's who. Ridiculous. That's pretty much the most egregious, but there are dozens and dozens of others that make no sense. Boletes are shown with the icon of a mushroom with a partial veil on the stipe, but not amanitas? Seriously, WTF, people. Nutty. The old guide had perfectly understandable symbolic icons for both of those that you could immediately recognize even if you didn't know the difference between a bolete and an amanita. They were obvious. Now they are buried under nonsense.

Also annoying is the lack of prior taxonomy information. And we all know that mushroom nomenclature changes about every five minutes, so not listing what the mushroom was known as five minutes ago is irritating especially since that term was probably in use for years if not decades. Ugh!

The binding is pretty decent, but I can see pages being torn and bent pretty easily in the future. There is a single satin ribbon which is also crazy given that you can't see look-alikes all together (like the Peterson guide, hint, hint) and that you'd need a whole bunch of bookmarks to see that kind of thing. Ditto for any suspects you may have since those aren't grouped in any logical way either. It needs a dozen cute little satin markers, not one.

Oh and there is a section for How to Use this Book and it contains nothing except some information about some conservation status icons that are used about 10 times in the whole 700+ pages. WTF? There is not a single useful identifications system at all. Not the usual if this then that type or the more innovative scheme the Peterson guide uses. Insane. It's really only good for the pretty pictures and the species information so my advice is to use this to confirm what you've already IDed using other sources. The editor signs off on the How to Use this Book page with good luck and godspeed. Yeah, you're gonna need it. show less

Oddly, this wasn't among the first books I bought when I became a rabid mushroom photographer. It's a recent purchase and while useful for photos and the little visual key to mushroom ID, it has a couple of drawbacks. First the color plates use "common names" for the mushrooms depicted. According to author Gary H. Lincoff it was his editor who asked for that. He complained that 90% of mushrooms didn't have common names and mycology enthusiasts were used to scientific names. They won. The show more other issue is that it hasn't been revised since 1981 which means MANY of the taxonomical details have changed due to DNA analysis and other improved ID technology. Still, it is a helpful book to have since the photos are good and the organization is easy to use. show less

I have thumbed through my copy of this one until the pages (at least the color ones) are falling out. Overall, a great guide, but sometimes good drawings would actually make it easier to positively identify the bird in question than the photographs this book provides.

Good mushroom book, but the formatting takes awhile to get used to. I would pick others first if I were selecting just one or two to own.