Luca Fezzi

Crossing the Rubicon contains a very insightful and detailed analysis of the events of 49BC. From this perspective alone, this book is excellent. Fezzi pulls together the disparate narratives of the various ancient sources for the events of that year, and methodically goes through them to tease out not only the sequence of the historical events, but also what was being experienced by the various figures involved. This very effectively highlighted the similarities and disparities between the show more sources, showing how different accounts can be affected by their context, their intended audience and the authorial agenda, as well as demonstrating that the most comprehensive picture can only be obtained by analysing multiple perspectives.

I did feel the book was somewhat let down by two things - its scope, and lack of a clear argument. I think it's unfortunately unavoidable for any book focussed on a particular moment in late Republican Rome that a large amount of set-up will be required. This was quite rushed through in Crossing the Rubicon, and also bounced between various locations and events in manner that wasn't always easy to follow. Additionally, despite the insistent reiteration of 'that fateful year 49 BC' (which I must admit became a little beaten to death by the end), there wasn't a real conclusion to how Caesar's decision was ultimately 'fateful' or any meaningful discussion of the long-term consequences of that decision.

The result was that although Fezzi's attention to detail was illuminating, there was nothing that particularly hit home. show less

An account of Caesar’s civil war against Pompey and the Optimates viewed primarily through the writings of Cicero.

The author provides a general context and background leading up to conflict commencing in 49 BC, however the majority of this work concentrates on Cicero’s vast body of letters. What becomes clear is the misinformation, conflicting loyalties and general apprehension which often occurs during times of extreme tumult.

This is a balanced account although perhaps a bit is lost in show more the translation- the author initially wrote in Italian. The author also assumes some degree of knowledge as to the history of this period, hence novices may struggle a bit following the overall narrative. Nonetheless, an interesting perspective and a valuable addition to other work on the Civil War. show less