
A. J. Krailsheimer (1921–2001)
Author of Pascal
About the Author
Series
Works by A. J. Krailsheimer
The Letters of Armand-Jean de Rancé, Abbot and Reformer of La Trappe, Volume 1 (1984) — Editor — 9 copies
The Letters of Armand-Jean de Rancé, Abbot and Reformer of La Trappe, Volume 2 (1984) — Editor — 2 copies
Armand-Jean de Rancé, Abbot of La Trappe : his influence in the cloister and the world (1974) 1 copy
The Letters of Armand-Jean De Rancé: Abbot and Reformer of la Trappe, 2 Vols. [Cistercian Studies Series, No. 80] (1984) 1 copy
Rabelais 1 copy
Pensées (Penguin Classics) 1 copy
Associated Works
Tagged
Common Knowledge
- Birthdate
- 1921
- Date of death
- 2001
- Gender
- male
- Occupations
- academic
Romanist
tutor - Organizations
- University of Oxford (Christ Church)
- Relationships
- Luke, David (colleague)
- Nationality
- UK
- Places of residence
- England, UK
- Associated Place (for map)
- England, UK
Members
Reviews
Insofar as academic names go, Alban Krailsheimer is hard to beat. He has produced a solid, brief summary of Pascal's life and works.
Krailsheimer writes very much from Pascal's corner. This is a welcome change: many of these 'short lives' of great philosophers adopt a sneering, superior tone. This is a sympathetic, useful work, but if you're new to Pascal, you are likely better off just reading the Pensees. Krailsheimer himself would probably say the same.
"The cult of the noble savage, like show more that of the golden age or the pastoral idyll, was vaguely nostalgic, a picturesque idealism rather than a serious philosophy. The desire to make a fresh start, individually or collectively, expressed dissatisfaction with the existing state of affairs rather than a positive desire for a return to cruder things. In any case, even the professedly anti-intellectual Montaigne gave the game away when, like every other humanist, he chose as his ideal man Socrates and not some feathered brave from Brazil. In so doing he acknowledged that the right use of reason leads to greater moral excellence than mere obedience to instinct, even if the worse use of reason led to a worse than bestial depravity." show less
Krailsheimer writes very much from Pascal's corner. This is a welcome change: many of these 'short lives' of great philosophers adopt a sneering, superior tone. This is a sympathetic, useful work, but if you're new to Pascal, you are likely better off just reading the Pensees. Krailsheimer himself would probably say the same.
"The cult of the noble savage, like show more that of the golden age or the pastoral idyll, was vaguely nostalgic, a picturesque idealism rather than a serious philosophy. The desire to make a fresh start, individually or collectively, expressed dissatisfaction with the existing state of affairs rather than a positive desire for a return to cruder things. In any case, even the professedly anti-intellectual Montaigne gave the game away when, like every other humanist, he chose as his ideal man Socrates and not some feathered brave from Brazil. In so doing he acknowledged that the right use of reason leads to greater moral excellence than mere obedience to instinct, even if the worse use of reason led to a worse than bestial depravity." show less
Lists
You May Also Like
Associated Authors
Statistics
- Works
- 13
- Also by
- 7
- Members
- 126
- Popularity
- #159,215
- Rating
- 3.9
- Reviews
- 2
- ISBNs
- 15
- Favorited
- 1
