Wong Kar-wai
Author of In the Mood for Love [2000 film]
About the Author
Works by Wong Kar-wai
Associated Works
Tagged
Common Knowledge
- Canonical name
- Wong Kar-wai
- Legal name
- 王家卫
王家衛 - Other names
- Wong, Kar wai
Wáng, Jiāwèi - Birthdate
- 1958-07-17
- Gender
- male
- Occupations
- film director
screenwriter - Nationality
- China
- Birthplace
- Shanghai, China
- Places of residence
- Hong Kong, China
- Associated Place (for map)
- China
Members
Reviews
The most notable aspect of this movie is the color. Excellent cast, and it's interesting to see these actors in different types of roles. The rest of the movie did not work for me. Disclaimer: Although I try to avoid specifics, there may be spoilers in the descriptions below.
Story: From the beginning, I didn't feel the draw of the initial two characters, and I did not get much from the character Elizabeth's journey. There was a theme of broken hearts throughout. The movie ties together and show more "comes back around", and without much meaning. I think there needs to be more character development. For example, I don't understand why Elizabeth took off, and then wrote to Jeremy as if for connection but left no way for him to write to her. While Elizabeth gained some life experiences, they seemed random, and did not add to the story or why Elizabeth returned to Jeremy's café.
Cinematography: The closeup shots of food—beautiful, and did not have much meaning. While the start of the movie was set in a café that the owner talked about how great his food was; I did not perceive that the food was great from the story and there wasn't a lot about food, mainly blueberry pie as a character. The red food shots were so abstract I was starting to wonder if I was seeing food or gore. It was just food. Then, when there were scenes with violence or fighting, the focus was blurred. Strange. The other aspect of the cinematography that bothered me was the camera moving around a scene with posts of obstacles in the way, so you go back and forth seeing and not seeing the subjects until the end of the rotation. This was used several times. Why? But the colors were beautiful. There were also graphically dramatic shots of the number of days. While this information has some use to orient the viewer, the presentation and the level of importance were not aligned, and there was relevance that I saw for the timeline, other than the total.
If you connect with the characters early on, this movie may be worth watching, otherwise, I do not recommend watching this movie.
— Rebecca show less
Story: From the beginning, I didn't feel the draw of the initial two characters, and I did not get much from the character Elizabeth's journey. There was a theme of broken hearts throughout. The movie ties together and show more "comes back around", and without much meaning. I think there needs to be more character development. For example, I don't understand why Elizabeth took off, and then wrote to Jeremy as if for connection but left no way for him to write to her. While Elizabeth gained some life experiences, they seemed random, and did not add to the story or why Elizabeth returned to Jeremy's café.
Cinematography: The closeup shots of food—beautiful, and did not have much meaning. While the start of the movie was set in a café that the owner talked about how great his food was; I did not perceive that the food was great from the story and there wasn't a lot about food, mainly blueberry pie as a character. The red food shots were so abstract I was starting to wonder if I was seeing food or gore. It was just food. Then, when there were scenes with violence or fighting, the focus was blurred. Strange. The other aspect of the cinematography that bothered me was the camera moving around a scene with posts of obstacles in the way, so you go back and forth seeing and not seeing the subjects until the end of the rotation. This was used several times. Why? But the colors were beautiful. There were also graphically dramatic shots of the number of days. While this information has some use to orient the viewer, the presentation and the level of importance were not aligned, and there was relevance that I saw for the timeline, other than the total.
If you connect with the characters early on, this movie may be worth watching, otherwise, I do not recommend watching this movie.
— Rebecca show less
This beautiful film was shot in 1994 by the great Christopher Doyle. Much of the film was lost. This cut was reconstructed from various prints and released in 2008.
Lists
Awards
You May Also Like
Associated Authors
Statistics
- Works
- 18
- Also by
- 1
- Members
- 717
- Popularity
- #35,385
- Rating
- 3.8
- Reviews
- 18
- ISBNs
- 34
- Languages
- 5




















