Author picture

Donald Abbott

Author of How the Wizard Came to Oz

7+ Works 82 Members 3 Reviews

About the Author

Includes the name: Donald Abbot

Series

Works by Donald Abbott

How the Wizard Came to Oz (1991) 24 copies
Father Goose in Oz (1994) 14 copies, 1 review
The Magic Chest of Oz (1993) 13 copies
The Speckled Rose of Oz (1995) 13 copies, 2 reviews
How the Wizard Saved Oz (1996) 12 copies
The Amber Flute of Oz (1998) 5 copies

Associated Works

Dot and Tot of Merryland (1901) — Illustrator, some editions — 65 copies, 3 reviews
The Nome King's Shadow in Oz (1992) — Illustrator — 19 copies, 1 review

Tagged

Common Knowledge

Birthdate
20th century
Gender
male
Nationality
USA
Places of residence
Scranton, Pennsylvania, USA
Associated Place (for map)
Pennsylvania, USA

Members

Reviews

3 reviews
"The Early Days of Oz" was a series of books from Books of Wonder back in the 1990s, all written and illustrated by Donald Abbott, chronicling, well, what it says in the title. There were six, two of them being prequels to The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, and the other four set in the gap between Wonderful Wizard and Marvelous Land, when the Scarecrow ruled the Emerald City. I assume this was all mostly because Abbott's illustrative style (at least in these books) is very imitative of W. W. show more Denslow. As a kid, I owned the two prequels, but just one of the interquels, The Speckled Rose of Oz. I am not motivated to pick up the other interquels (Magic ChestFather Goose, and Amber Flute), but I was willing to read the one I already owned to my kids in the gap where it takes place.

Rereading it, I feel validated in this decision because it is, quite frankly, awful. There are probably some ingredients here for a good Oz adventure, but the plot is terribly constructed. At its beginning, the Scarecrow, the Tin Woodman, and the Cowardly Lion are judging a flower competition. (Abbott always calls the latter simply "Lion" because he's no longer "cowardly," which I guess makes sense, but is not really consistent with any of the following books.) One of the entrants is Sir Gyle, who turns out to be the brother of the Wicked Witches of East and West out for revenge, and who attempts to assassinate the Scarecrow wirh a fire-breathing flower. Then all the flowers of Oz begin to disappear, because of an evil living tree called Poison Oak. You might think these two things are linked... but no, it's a complete coincidence! The three friends of Dorothy travel to stop Poison Oak, secretly being harassed by Sir Gyle. On their way, they bump into Lady Minerva Moonstruck, the daughter of the Old Man in the Moon, who is searching for her missing husband. When they find Poison Oak, they defeat him quite easily, but then his pet spider turns out to be Lady Minerva's husband, who also wants to take over Oz... but don't worry, they don't need to do anything interesting or clever, because she turns up and recaptures her errant husband. The threesome then has to go back and defeat Sir Gyle.

None of it is interesting or clever. I did like the idea of Sir Gyle (I'm always down for peeks into the lore of the wicked witches), but reading it right after Wonderful Wizard, where this trio is clever, kind, and brave when they have to do things, the contrast here is stark, given they mostly bumble their way around and accomplish everything either by accident or with the assistance of Glinda. Abbott is a very sloppy plotter; there's a particularly bad bit where the Lion falls into a chasm, the Scarecrow and the Tin Woodman go on without him, and the Lion catches up to them a bit later, and we learn that in the same amount of time they walked to Poison Oak's cottage, he landed in an underground river, was carried away by it for miles until it flowed to the surface, and then somehow tracked the other two to the cottage.

At least it's short, and at least the pictures are nice. My kids were, as always I suppose, entertained well enough, but I'm pretty sure a couple days after we'd finished it, had already forgotten its insubstantial happenings.
show less
Pleasant, but really only for very small children. It's a slight story with tremendous amounts of coincidence, largely rehashing characters from The Wonderful Wizard of Oz to limited effect. The Scarecrow, Tin Woodman, and Lion don't really even need to be in the story, although it's nice to have the Kalidahs featured. Abbot does a reasonable approximation of Baum's prose style, but the real appeal of the book is in the delightful illustrations that homage W. W. Denslow's work.
Very straightforward but pleasant Oz tale set between the first two novels. Best enjoyed by small children with a couple of little easter eggs for Baum aficionados. The best part is, of course, Abbott's illustrations, which are a loving homage to W. W. Denslow.

You May Also Like

Associated Authors

Statistics

Works
7
Also by
2
Members
82
Popularity
#220,760
Rating
½ 3.5
Reviews
3
ISBNs
14

Charts & Graphs