Jorge Cham
Author of We Have No Idea: A Guide to the Unknown Universe
About the Author
Image credit: photography by rax
Series
Works by Jorge Cham
Tagged
Common Knowledge
- Canonical name
- Cham, Jorge
- Birthdate
- 1976-05
- Gender
- male
- Education
- Georgia Institute of Technology
Stanford University - Occupations
- teacher
researcher - Organizations
- California Institute of Technology
- Nationality
- Panama
- Places of residence
- USA
Members
Reviews
Wonderful pop-science book. While it might be dismissed as not being technical enough, books like The Universe: Leading Scientists Explore the Origin, Mysteries, and Future of the Cosmos are sometimes so technical (and badly formatted) that all the scientific rigor gets in the way of actually conveying information for the reader.
In «We have no Idea», Daniel Whiteson and Jorge Cham go a bit against conventional wisdom and talk about the things we don't know about. But, how can you even know show more that? Long story short: what we know is a big help in defining the unknown, similar to how negative space is defined in design.
The book accomplishes what many other pop-sci writers try, which is to establish more questions than it answers. Heck, that's what good science does. While guiding us through the edge of physics and the universe, the authors are careful to distinguish that which we are pretty certain of and what some possible answers might be, all peppered with the soft and charming humor that you might know from PHD Comics. The book chapters are neatly organized in Big Themes (e. g. «what is matter?», «what is time»...) and conveniently paced so you almost always have either something to look forward to and something to base your new knowledge upon.
The humor is hit-or-miss for me (and certainly not as funny as What If?: Serious Scientific Answers to Absurd Hypothetical Questions by fellow webcomic author Randall Munroe) but it never gets in the way of the explanation. If you can visualize some physics concepts using ferrets, llamas and practical jokes, this might be for you.
A book worth picking up either to learn about how much we don't know or to peek into the sometimes dirty windows of how science is done. show less
In «We have no Idea», Daniel Whiteson and Jorge Cham go a bit against conventional wisdom and talk about the things we don't know about. But, how can you even know show more that? Long story short: what we know is a big help in defining the unknown, similar to how negative space is defined in design.
The book accomplishes what many other pop-sci writers try, which is to establish more questions than it answers. Heck, that's what good science does. While guiding us through the edge of physics and the universe, the authors are careful to distinguish that which we are pretty certain of and what some possible answers might be, all peppered with the soft and charming humor that you might know from PHD Comics. The book chapters are neatly organized in Big Themes (e. g. «what is matter?», «what is time»...) and conveniently paced so you almost always have either something to look forward to and something to base your new knowledge upon.
The humor is hit-or-miss for me (and certainly not as funny as What If?: Serious Scientific Answers to Absurd Hypothetical Questions by fellow webcomic author Randall Munroe) but it never gets in the way of the explanation. If you can visualize some physics concepts using ferrets, llamas and practical jokes, this might be for you.
A book worth picking up either to learn about how much we don't know or to peek into the sometimes dirty windows of how science is done. show less
I think this book does a great job of laying out the tapestry of concepts that physics is aware of and cannot explain (yet). I'm sure I will recommend it to my gen-ed physics students; many of them have their interest piqued and I have to leave them hanging because 16 weeks is just not long enough to teach all the awesome physics. A book like this helps close the gap a little, for the students who are interested enough in reading on.
And don't get me wrong, I'm a huge fan of a good physics show more pun. I've been known to use puns in my classes. However, they just wore out a little after about 250 pages or so in this book. I mean, yeah, a "good" (read: horrible) dad joke every now and again is tolerable. A dad joke every page or twice every page? For 350 pages? You need some serious grit for that. show less
And don't get me wrong, I'm a huge fan of a good physics show more pun. I've been known to use puns in my classes. However, they just wore out a little after about 250 pages or so in this book. I mean, yeah, a "good" (read: horrible) dad joke every now and again is tolerable. A dad joke every page or twice every page? For 350 pages? You need some serious grit for that. show less
An exploration of what is known and what is unknown in the realm of physics and the universe. I enjoyed the humor (cats, llamas, and baboons figure prominently) and the many comical drawings sprinkled throughout the book. There are many footnotes both serious and funny, and a list of endnotes and further reading at the back.
I can't speak too highly of this book. I've been a student of science for many years and have always been puzzled by the apparent certainty about scientific knowledge. Except when one keeps asking the question ...."Well what's that made of? or where does that come from?"....one starts to come up against barriers.......like "Well, we just don't know that yet". This book puts our knowledge into some perspective. All the knowledge we have about the things in the universe...stars, planets, show more living things, atoms, quarks, light, electricity, is knowledge about 5% of the universe. Scientists have slowly come to the realisation that some 27% of the universe is matter of some sort but we have no idea what sort of matter it is. There are some guesses but so far no real understanding. So it's being called "dark matter". That leaves the other 68% of the universe. Now I must admit that I'm still not totally clear on how the scientists have been able to pin this 68% to dark energy ....... that is, as opposed to the 32% that is matter (5% we know about and 27% is "dark" matter). That is, how are they relating mass and energy.......maybe via Einstein's equation....though does it still hold with Dark energy? But this big picture of our understanding sets the background for a lot more of the questions I have always wondered about such as: What is space?, What is time? The mysteries of mass....and so on. Rather alarming to find (although greatly illuminating also) that we actually have no idea about many of these fundamental questions.
I loved the book. It's illustrated with cartoons throughout. Some are maybe a bit annoying and trite but generally they are quite helpful in visualising the various issues raised. So a really helpful partnership between artist Jorge Cham and CERN particle physicist Daniel Whiteson. Strongly recommend it...in fact, I gave the book as a present to a couple of relatives who, I thought, would benefit from reading. show less
I loved the book. It's illustrated with cartoons throughout. Some are maybe a bit annoying and trite but generally they are quite helpful in visualising the various issues raised. So a really helpful partnership between artist Jorge Cham and CERN particle physicist Daniel Whiteson. Strongly recommend it...in fact, I gave the book as a present to a couple of relatives who, I thought, would benefit from reading. show less
Lists
Awards
You May Also Like
Associated Authors
Statistics
- Works
- 23
- Members
- 1,995
- Popularity
- #12,901
- Rating
- 4.2
- Reviews
- 46
- ISBNs
- 84
- Languages
- 9
- Favorited
- 2

























