Once again, Elizabeth Lowell didn't disappoint. I hadn't read any of her historical romance stories before. I like them, although not as much as her jewel (modern day) ones. This one has a bit of the mystical in it (I guess that's what to call it). It wasn't too much for me, but might be a turn off to some.Good characters and nice romance.

This is one of the books that I'm embarrased to rate. It was actually a good romance and not trashy - but the title... It's a funny title (the long title is: leave it to cleavage - an uplifting book) and she makes decent use of humor in the book.I will look for more books by Wendy Wax.

If I knew how to not give a book any stars this would be it. I don't think I've ever rated a book this low or not cared for a writing style this much. I tried, on two separate occasions, to pick this up. I even skipped ahead a little to see if the style would change or if I would like it better. Nope. Just made me frsutrated. I can suffer through many books and just know I won't likely choose the author again. This one I didn't even want to finish the page. I cannot and will not recommend this book, or this author. If this piques your curiousity, by all means, pick up a copy. I imagine there are a lot of people who do like her style - she has other best sellers.

I used to enjoy Greeley. I still enjoyed his style, for the most part. But, I found his political commentary offputting. Some of it was neccessary or useful for a book about the president, but there were a lot of strong political opinions that distracted me from the story. Interesting book, quick read, seemed like the same style as his other Bishop Blackie books - but it's been many years since I've read another.

I enjoy her style. The plot is mostly predictable yet enjoyable. Nice romance with a little sizzle. I'd recommend it if you like romances.

I was disappointed in this book. It's a weird mix of Nora Roberts and JD Robb. (I know they're the same author, but they're definitely different styles.)I found the precipitating 'incident' disturbing although I understand how it was needed to frame the rest of the story. Then I found the rest of the book an odd blend of 'mystery' and romance with the romance almost an afterthought.On the upside, I had read this book before and KNEW the twist at the end. Yet, I still ended up reading the entire thing and not knowing exactly how it would wrap up. I would credit Roberts storytelling ability for that. Even though this was not my favorite by her (and not my favorite, in general) I still gave it 3 stars because it was an interesting and mainly entertaining read.

I often find that when an author I enjoy pairs with someone as they transition out of novel writing I don't care for the result (as with Cussler). However, I liked the result in this case just fine.James Patterson has always been someone I enjoyed reading but I don't know if I ever felt more strongly about any of his books. So, it's been a long time since I've been in the mood to read one of his books. (A little insight, I have to be in exactly the mood to read a particular book. So there are books on my to-read shelf that have been sitting there waiting for the perfect time for many years.)Back to the book, there were plenty of twists and turns to make this interseting and plenty of heartache and heartbreak to make this a psychological thriller. However, I think that's a little too intense of a word. I found it a very quick, easy, and enjoyable read.

I am finding Elizabeth Lowell consistently good. Little suspension and plenty of romance, which I'm a sucker for. I particularly enjoy these because they have some information that seems like it could be real about the jewelery business or about jems or metals. So, I feel like I might be gaining some new information from this contemporary fiction, which rarely happens. (Of course, I do understand that this is fiction and there's a good likelihood that the details were added to make a good story, so I don't pretend to have gained a lot of information. Still makes me feel like my time was a little more usefully spent than just stress-relief.)I highly recommend the entire jem/metal series, and Elizabeth Lowell in general.

I have now, apparently, read this book more than once. However, it wasn't familiar and was different from some of her other JD Robb books. This one does a lot more delving into Dallas' psyche. It worked okay for this one and I do appreciate the character building. Yet I found myself glad that most of her books are lighter with the psychology.Good read. As far as I can tell, JD Robb books are consistently worth a few hours/nights of mental escape.

I'm really liking her books. This one is no exception.

I really like this series.

This is one of those books that I know I've read, but each time I read the description it doesn't sound familiar. Then I read the first few lines and it begins to be familiar and I think I liked it, but is that just because I've read the beginning a few times before, trying to remember if I'd read it?

I really like her writing style. I'm so pleased that I just happened upon her; I like to find new authors.Now that I read some of the other reviews, I suppose I agree. But, having gone into reaidng this with NO expectations - it performed marvelously for me. A decent story (not sure if it's believeable, but not too corny that I had to put it down), plenty of character interaction/romance, plus some action/adventure/suspense.I also like the series. I did not read them in order, but I like the idea of the continuation of characters that series books offer.

Not my favorite of his but very interesting from an auto-biographical sort of place.

I have read mediocre or sorse reviews of this writing team. But I just don't agree. Could be that I am reading purely for pleasure and I just read what I like and not to be critical. Could be that I have yet to read one of the books in this series that some didn't like. I really like their style and I liked this book. I will look for more in this series.

I am not quite done with this book yet, but I'm really enjoying it. The weird thing is that it seems very familiar yet I don't know exactly how it ends. Did I read it before and my pregnancy brain has repressed the ending or the development of the characters? I'd say it's more likely that there is a book that is similar in style that I've read. Yet, this is a seemingly unique style and book. Puzzling. Perhaps by the end it will become clear.All in all, an enjoyable, pretty fast read.

This was one of my least favorite romance reads lately. The writing was just fine (I do like her style) but there was way too much other stuff and not enough of the romance story for me.

I don't remember enough from one romance to another to keep track of which characters I liked/disliked from which book. That might change with this one. This is certainly my favorite of hers. It's certainly my favorite romance from this year but it's different enough from J. Crusie that I can't say that it's my favorite overall. Certainly a good read for romance readers. I recommend it.

I think this is a fine book of examples. Most are interesting, most I hadn't heard of or thought of, and yet, I don't find myself surprised at any of the conclusions.

I like romances and Jennifer Crusie is among my favorite romance authors. This book didn't disappoint.

I'm a sucker for a romance. Is this particularly good, compared to other romances, I don't remember. I do remember that I really enjoyed reading it.

I forgot how much I like Uris' writing style in the years since I've read any of his books. I enjoy his kind of history, which is saying a lot because history is very rarely something I want to read about. I have no idea if this story is one-sided or riddled with inaccuracies as some claim about his other books. I know that while I was reading it I was feeling history come alive for me - which was rare and enjoyable.I enjoy his strong and vivid characters, which were as strong in this book as in others. Perhaps stronger than in QB VII and not quite like Ari from Exodus.I will definitely recommend this book even though I haven't included in my must reads.

I remembering loving thsi heartbreaking book in grade school. Wonder if I still would...

I had to read this and I thought it was decent. But, I'm finding that even many years later, I still refer to it and have discussion about parts of it. So, if staying power and citability drives ratings, then I guess this should be a 5 star.

Just couldn't get into this one.

Surprisingly, I liked it almost sa much as [b:Gone with the Wind|18405|Gone With The Wind|Margaret Mitchell|http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1166913011s/18405.jpg|3358283]. This was a jumping-off-point for me into the work of A. Ripley, whom I generally really enjoy.

Definite a classic for me!

Loved the movie and the book is MUCH better! If you haven't read it yet, do it now. :o)

This was a very quick and easy read. Some of it seemed rather intuitive, but the insights around even these parts were enough for me to give this a very high rating and recommend this. (Plus, they have a quiz and I'm a sucker for those.)

I have been to enough meetings that are governed by Robert's Rules that I probably know more than I think. Then again, maybe this is the perfect time to actually read the rules.