4J

Chloe’s fingerprints were on the gun. We also know she had financial problems. Does this make her seem more of a possibility as a killer?

Yes she is definitely suspicious about the killing of her parents.

She may have touched the gun at some point in the past. It seems too obvious for her to be the killer.

I think if she’d used the gun to kill her parents, she wouldn’t have been stupid enough not to wear gloves.

>4 Sergeirocks: Or wipe fingerprints off the gun.

I’m still not convinced she is responsible for the murders.

>5 Andrew-theQM: And if she’d wiped her own prints off and wanted to set up a murder-suicide scenario, she’d have known to put her father’s left hand prints on the gun.

Her fingerprints were on the gun previously. I don’t think she killed them.

Definitely involved if not the actual killer.

I wonder if Chloe's financial difficulties are a red herring, and someone else is the murderer. She would know her father is left-handed.