Citizen of space
Talk Good Show Sir! — bad science fiction and fantasy covers
Join LibraryThing to post.
1daard23
"All the cover artists just quit! Hey...you have a kid in kindergarten right now, don't you?"
Captured in the wild, so the image is skewed. BTW, This is the December 1, 1955 printing by Ballantine. I thought this was going to be mid 60's artwork.
Captured in the wild, so the image is skewed. BTW, This is the December 1, 1955 printing by Ballantine. I thought this was going to be mid 60's artwork.
2EndofDiskOne
Representational art is for the NON-citizens in space.
3GSSex-noob
>2 EndofDiskOne: The proles and immigrants don't DESERVE anything but reproductions of real objects.
Although it does say "citizen", singular, so maybe only one guy (and any number of kids) gets this kind of work.
Although it does say "citizen", singular, so maybe only one guy (and any number of kids) gets this kind of work.
4bam2001
Early Richard Powers1, perhaps the founding figure of the "blobs, sometimes spiky, and swirls WTF am I looking at" school of SF art.
(Some of his covers are actually pretty good surrealist art. Don't look at them for information on the contents, though.)
1 https://flashbak.com/the-surrealist-sci-fi-cover-art-of-richard-m-powers-404897/ https://www.spacial-anomaly.com/the-surreal-science-fiction-art-of-richard-m-pow...
(Some of his covers are actually pretty good surrealist art. Don't look at them for information on the contents, though.)
1 https://flashbak.com/the-surrealist-sci-fi-cover-art-of-richard-m-powers-404897/ https://www.spacial-anomaly.com/the-surreal-science-fiction-art-of-richard-m-pow...
5GSSex-noob
>4 bam2001: The ones on that page are mostly closer to representational than this one. They're identifiably SF thingy objects, as opposed to these blobs.

